Spinning at the speed of light?

RunSwimSurf
Gold Member
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Actually I have a couple of questions. First of all, I'm new here so hello to everyone.

1) Is it possible for an object or something to rotate at the speed of light? For example, with a special record player, can a record spin at or near the speed of light or does c only refer to a straight path? Also, do the same rules apply meaning an infinite amount of energy is needed to accelerate the record to c?

2) Let's say that it is possible for a record to spin at light speed. If the inside and the outside of the record are traveling at the speed of light, but the outside of the record must travel a greater distance, then wouldn't the outside of the record be traveling faster than the speed of light? (I vaguely remember seeing this problem in a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip)

3) Since it's impossible to accelerate an object to the speed of light, is it possible for an object to exist which has always been faster than light? Another massless particle of some sort? Or does SR forbid this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RunSwimSurf said:
1) Is it possible for an object or something to rotate at the speed of light? For example, with a special record player, can a record spin at or near the speed of light or does c only refer to a straight path? Also, do the same rules apply meaning an infinite amount of energy is needed to accelerate the record to c?
Yeah, it's impossible because it takes an infinite amount of energy to accelerate any massive object to c.
RunSwimSurf said:
3) Since it's impossible to accelerate an object to the speed of light, is it possible for an object to exist which has always been faster than light? Another massless particle of some sort? Or does SR forbid this?
SR doesn't really forbid it, such hypothetical particles are called "tachyons", see this article. But there's no evidence they exist, and if SR is correct any faster-than-light signalling would also open up the possibility of sending signals backwards in time for reasons relating to the relativity of simultaneity, so they'd cause problems with causality.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top