What Is the Impulse Given to a Ball by the Floor in a Bounce?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikejax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the impulse given to a ball by the floor after it bounces. A ball with a mass of 0.150 kg is dropped from a height of 1.25 m and rebounds to a height of 0.960 m, leading to an impact speed of 4.94 m/s and a rebound speed of 4.33 m/s. The initial momentum before hitting the floor is 0.741 kg-m/s downward, while the final momentum after the bounce is 0.6495 kg-m/s upward. The confusion arises from the textbook's assertion that impulse is the change in momentum, which is calculated as the final momentum minus the initial momentum, resulting in an upward impulse of approximately 1.39 kg-m/s. The key takeaway is that impulse involves the direction of momentum, highlighting the difference between momentum and energy.
Mikejax
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a height of 0.960 m.* What impulse was given to the ball by the floor?

Homework Equations

impact speed is given by (1/2)mv^2 = mgh1.
rebound speed is given by (1/2)mv^2 = mgh2.
The impulse of the floor is the change in momentum.
mv2(up) - mv1(down) = m(v1 + v2)up

The Attempt at a Solution

using the speed impact speed equations, I have solved for v in both cases.* The ball hits the ground with a speed of 4.94 m/s.* Using mgh2 from its rebound height, one can find the potential energy and then solve for the velocity that the ball had when leaving the floor, which, algebraically, comes to 4.33 m/s.

So then, momentum just before hitting floor is mv = 0.15kg*4.94m/s = 0.741 kg-m/s.
momentum just after hitting floor = mv = 0.15kg*4.33m/s = 0.6495 kg-m/s.

My textbook describes "impulse" as the change in momentum of an object. So I took the difference, which is .741 - .6495 = 0.0915.

The correct answer, according to my book is 1.36 kg-m/s.Why did they add the momentums?

My understanding is that impulse, is a difference, not a sum of momenta.I realize that, if one uses Impulse = momentum(final) - momentum(initial), you get the answer (because both - signs make the operation an addition)...but then the whole conecpt isn't very clear to me.It seems to me that the impact of the ball on the floor, is reducing the ball's momentum and velocity, thus, conceptually it's as if the floor is "taking away" energy from the ball. But mathematically, in this problem, it seems we are required to "add' this energy to the initial momentum of the ball...it doesn't make sense to me, I was wondering if someone could clarify the issue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mikejax said:
So then, momentum just before hitting floor is mv = 0.15kg*4.94m/s = 0.741 kg-m/s.
momentum just after hitting floor = mv = 0.15kg*4.33m/s = 0.6495 kg-m/s.

My textbook describes "impulse" as the change in momentum of an object. So I took the difference, which is .741 - .6495 = 0.0915.

The correct answer, according to my book is 1.36 kg-m/s.Why did they add the momentums?
Realize that momentum is a vector quantity--direction counts.

Let's call the up direction to be positive (+) and the down direction to be negative (-).

The initial momentum is 0.741 kg-m/s down, thus -0.741.
The final momentum is 0.6495 kg-m/s up, thus +0.6495.

The difference, final - initial, is: (+0.6495) - (-0.741) = + 1.39 kg-m/s, which means an upward impulse. (I'm using your numbers; I didn't check your calculations.)

Note that momentum and energy are two very different things. What changes the momentum of something is a force acting over some time. The ground smacks the ball upward, changing its momentum.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top