Solving a Complex Rotational Dynamics Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a complex rotational dynamics problem involving three disks with different rotational inertias and angular speeds. Participants emphasize the importance of conservation of angular momentum, stating that the total angular momentum before and after the disks combine must remain constant. To find the final angular velocity, one must sum the individual angular momentums, taking into account their directions, and then divide by the total moment of inertia. The conversation highlights the need to apply the correct sign convention for clockwise and counterclockwise rotations. Ultimately, the original poster successfully solved the problem with the guidance received.
x2008kwa
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've got a question that I'm stuck on.

Three disks are spinning independently on the same axle without friction. Their respective rotational inertias and angular speeds are I,w (clockwise); 2I,3w (counterclockwise); and 4I,w/2 (clockwise). The disks then slide together and stick together, forming one piece with a single angular velocity. What will be the direction and the rate of rotation of the single piece?
Express your answer in terms of one or both of the variables and and appropriate constants. Use a minus sign for clockwise rotation.


I haven't really made progress on this question. My prof is abosolutely useless (it's his first year at my university and most likely his last judging by all of the complaints). So basically I haven't been taught how to approach this problem. I've read the texbook and can't figure out how this problem can be solved.
Not necessarly just looking for the answer to the problem, but how to approach it.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

What does your book say about the conservation of angular momentum? Does it by any chance indicate that in a closed system that Angular Momentum remains constant?

Isn't that all you have to know?
 
Thank you very much for your response.

Yes, I do know that angular momentum should be conserved... and that L = I x w...

Therefore I know that the angular momentum after the discs combine must be equal to the sum of all of the angular momentums of the individual discs... But I'm not sure how to go about combining these and obtaining the final angular speed. Any hints on how this is done?
 
Since all three disks are on the same axis, you don't need to worry about different directions in 3-D, but you do need to worry about clockwise vs counterclockwise. These will get opposite signs, and the problems tells you which one to make negative. Then, you use your equation for the three individual L's, and add them together with the appropriate signs to get the resulting L. Finally, to obtain the resulting w, you use your equation again to solve for it, but you need to know the resulting I. Since this is all on the same axis, the I's just sum, all with the same sign (because, like mass, I cannot be negative).
 
x2008kwa said:
Thank you very much for your response.

Yes, I do know that angular momentum should be conserved... and that L = I x w...

Therefore I know that the angular momentum after the discs combine must be equal to the sum of all of the angular momentums of the individual discs... But I'm not sure how to go about combining these and obtaining the final angular speed. Any hints on how this is done?

Then figure simply that the sum of the L (using the sign convention required by the problem) divided by the total I will be your final ω .
 
Thanks a ton for the help guys. Makes complete sense...
Got the answer correct now. Much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top