How to study the Feynman lectures?

AI Thread Summary
To effectively study the Feynman Lectures on Physics and Irodov's problem book, it's beneficial to leverage prior knowledge from a previous physics course. Approaching the Feynman Lectures before or after class coverage depends on personal learning preferences; pre-reading can enhance understanding, while post-class reading reinforces concepts. For Irodov, tackling all problems in one section before moving on can deepen comprehension, but selectively choosing problems across sections may provide a broader perspective on physics. It's acknowledged that Irodov problems are challenging yet rewarding, and it's advisable to solve a manageable number of problems to build confidence before progressing. Engaging with these materials can significantly enhance the application of calculus in physics, revealing the beauty of the subject.
integration
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I got my final pick of books as extra readings/studying to supplement my rather deficient Physics C class. It's the Feynman lectures on Physics and Irodov problem book (and when my calculus is ready, I'll tackle Introduction to Mechanics by Kleppner and Kolenkow)

How do you think should I approach both books? What is a good way to study them? Should I start reading Feynman before the Physics C class covers that topic, or after we covered the topic in class? BTW, I already had a physics course last year (physics B, so I have a pretty broad base).

Do you think it's better to do all or most of the Irodov problems from 1 section, and then move on, or make a pick from each sections to get a more comprehensive view of physics?

Thanks.

PS: for anyone who solves Irodov problems, I feel your masochistic pain :) ; they are tough but super cool at the same time. I'm so happy with the book, I finally get to maximally use the calculus tools we learn!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doing all the problems in Irodov would take too long. Do a few problems until you feel comfortable with the material and move on to the next topic.
 
I know that love. The pleasure which you get in solving them is just superb. The beauty of the nature is unveiled for an undergrad student by irodov.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top