How does light show particle properties?

markoX
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

There is some things which i can't digest it.In light(gamma or X-ray) detectors we just get tick...tick..tick...tick from detectors,But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).Wow...how is it possible if you consider same light source for two case!
What hapends for light which show to different behavior?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
markoX said:
But In the light interference we see pattern(which it is continuous).
Crank down the intensity and you'll see that "continuous" pattern being built up tick by tick.
 
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc. The intensities required depend upon the wavelength of the light. I believe that was, historically, the first indication that light came in "quanta".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Also consider the "photo-electric" effect. Shining a low intensity light on a photo-electric cell will give no effect at all until, as you increase the intensity, a certain threshold of intensity is reached. A then no increase in the current until you hit twice that that intensity, etc.
I wouldn't put it that way. If the frequency of the light is below the needed threshold, you can increase the intensity all you want and still get nothing. And if the frequency is above the threshold, even a low intensity light will produce photoelectrons.

Nonetheless, you are correct that the photoelectric effect is another demonstration of light's particulate nature.
 
Thanks for your replies.So are you saying me in fact light has particle nature which it shows wave behaviors classically (in large scale)?
 
Er... this post may be relevant with regards to the "particle" properties and the photoelectric effect:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1891152&postcount=6

I would say that there are two extremely strong type of evidence for the "particle" nature of light: the which-way experiment, and the photon antibunching experiment.

Unlike the standard, naive photoelectric effect, there are no classical, SED-type attempt at describing those two phenomena.

We also must be very careful in clarifying that the "particle" of light that we are talking about here has nothing to do with the classical particle, where a particle has definite spatial boundary, etc. The particle of light here only implies that the energy comes in discrete amounts and not divisible. So at a beamsplitter, it has to choose to go one way, or the other, but not both, thus, a which-way situation.

Zz.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top