Magnetic field surrounding a long, straight wire.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field produced by a lightning bolt, modeled as a long, straight wire. The current is determined to be 8666.66 A based on the charge and time provided. The initial calculation for the magnetic field resulted in 0.3421 T, which is significantly higher than the expected value of 8.67e-05 T from the answer key. A participant points out a potential error in the calculation, suggesting the need for proper parentheses in the equation. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the mistake and a correction to the calculation method.
einsteinoid
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a lightning bolt, 13 C of charge flows in a time of 1.5 10-3 s. Assuming that the lightning bolt can be represented as a long, straight line of current, what is the magnitude of the magnetic field at a distance of 20 m from the bolt?


Homework Equations



B = mu(I)/2(pi)r

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, the current is the change of charge over time, thus should be equal to 13/(1.5X10^-3), or 8666.66 A. The only other variable in in the equation would be "r", or radius, which should be the distance from the bolt (20 m).

So, by plugging 8666.66 into the "I" variable and plugging 20 into the "r" variable, my equation yields B to equal ".3421 T".

According to the answer key to this homework assignment, the value I should be getting for B is "8.67e-05 T". Am I using the incorrect equation?

Thanks,

-Will
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi einsteinoid,

einsteinoid said:

Homework Statement



In a lightning bolt, 13 C of charge flows in a time of 1.5 10-3 s. Assuming that the lightning bolt can be represented as a long, straight line of current, what is the magnitude of the magnetic field at a distance of 20 m from the bolt?


Homework Equations



B = mu(I)/2(pi)r

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, the current is the change of charge over time, thus should be equal to 13/(1.5X10^-3), or 8666.66 A. The only other variable in in the equation would be "r", or radius, which should be the distance from the bolt (20 m).

So, by plugging 8666.66 into the "I" variable and plugging 20 into the "r" variable, my equation yields B to equal ".3421 T".

According to the answer key to this homework assignment, the value I should be getting for B is "8.67e-05 T". Am I using the incorrect equation?

Thanks,

-Will

What are you using for mu_0?
 
4(pi) X 10^-7



Btw, i accidently just reported your post haha. In the comment part i entered the value for the permeability of free space... oops :?
 
einsteinoid said:
4(pi) X 10^-7



Btw, i accidently just reported your post haha. In the comment part i entered the value for the permeability of free space... oops :?

I think you are making a calculator error. You seem to be calculating:

<br /> \frac{\mu_0 I}{2} \pi r<br />

I think if you put parenthesis around the 2 pi r you'll get the right answer.
 
Oh i see, wow that's an easy correction. Thanks!
 
einsteinoid said:
Oh i see, wow that's an easy correction. Thanks!

You're welcome!

And thanks for letting me know about the report, in case I get an inquiring email...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top