Physics Confusion: The Ball's Trajectory in an Upward Throw Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter omgwtf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the trajectory of a ball thrown upwards with an initial speed of 29.4 m/s and the effects of gravity. After 3 seconds, the ball stops ascending due to gravity's acceleration of -9.8 m/s², but it continues to fall for an additional second, resulting in a downward speed of -9.8 m/s at 4 seconds. The confusion regarding the final speed arises from misapplying the formulas; the correct approach involves calculating the change in speed due to acceleration and adding it to the initial speed. Gravity only pulls the object downwards, while the initial speed is provided by the throw. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately analyzing motion in physics.
omgwtf
Say there's a ball being thrown upwards (from the bottom to the top of a building) with an initial speed of 29.4 m/s for 4 seconds at an acceleration of -9.8 m/s².

Now here's a few of my problems:

1.) My book says the ball would stop after 3 seconds. Wouldn't it therefore be pointless to calculate what would happen in 4 seconds?

2.) My book says the end speed (V1/Vf) would be -9.8 m/s. Doesn't the end speed always equal acceleration times time (V1 = at) which would therefore be -39.2 m/s?

Also, what's the difference between starting at rest (with the initial speed being zero) and being thrown (for example, in this case, 29.4 m/s), isn't gravity technically 'throwing' the object in question?

Thanks to anyone who can explain this, it's confusing me alot. I've only been working with physics (self-teaching) for about 4 days so excuse the newbieness of the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the question is perfectly clear. What you've got though, is a ball thrown upwards at 29.4 m/s, and this is all you need to find that it reaches the top of it's flight, or stops at t = 3 seconds. So the question wants you to find what it's velocity is after 4 seconds - in other words when it has been coming down again for 1 second, which is fairly trivial.

I don't really understand what you're asking with your last question. Here, you are throwing the ball upwards so you have to give it an initial velocity or it won't go anywhere - gravity acts downwards on the ball to slow it down and eventually stop it. Can you clarify a bit if you want a further/better explanation?
 
I agree with mulder that ur question is not really clear, i am sure that if u make it a little clearer we would be able to help you.
But at the moment, i hope this equation till help you :
Vf=Vi+at
 
Thanks STAii, that pretty much cleared it up. I was using the wrong formula to calculate 'Vf'. As for my second question, I think I understand it now.

Thanks guys.
 
"1.) My book says the ball would stop after 3 seconds. Wouldn't it therefore be pointless to calculate what would happen in 4 seconds?"

The ball starts moving upward. Since the acceleration due to gravity is downward, the ball slows down and after 3 seconds comes to a stop. (the acceleration is -9.8 m/s^2. After 3 seconds, the total "change in speed" will be (3s)(-9.8m/s^2)= -29.4 m/s so that the original speed of +29.4 m/s has reduced to 29.4- 29.4= 0 m/s.

But the acceleration still there! The ball doesn't "hang in the air". It still has an acceleration (because gravity is still pulling on it) of -29.4 m/s^2 so after 1 MORE second, it is moving downward at -9.8 m/s. You could have calculated that without worrying about when the ball "stopped" by saying, "since the acceleration is -9.8 m/s, in 4 seconds the change in speed will be (4)(-9.8)= 39.2 m/s. Since the initial speed was 29.4 m/s, after 4 seconds, the speed will be 29.4- 39.2= -9.8 m/s."

"2.) My book says the end speed (V1/Vf) would be -9.8 m/s. Doesn't the end speed always equal acceleration times time (V1 = at) which would therefore be -39.2 m/s?"

Well, first, the end speed is "Vf", not "V1/Vf". I presume you mean V1 to be the initial speed. As long as acceleration is a constant, the CHANGE in speed is "acceleration times time": 4(-9.8)=
-39.2 m/s. However, the final speed will be "initial speed plus change in speed":in this case, 29.4- 39.2= -9.8m/s as we got above.

IF we just dropped the ball from the top of the building, the initial speed would be 0 ("dropped" not "threw up/down") and the speed after 4 seconds would be 0- 39.2= -39.2 m/s.

"Also, what's the difference between starting at rest (with the initial speed being zero) and being thrown (for example, in this case, 29.4 m/s), isn't gravity technically 'throwing' the object in question?"

No, gravity doesn't "throw" anything, it only "pulls"! The "acceleration due to gravity" gives you the change in speed. That has to be added to the initial speed to get the final speed.

If you stand on the roof of the building a DROP the ball (initial speed 0), after 4 seconds its speed will be 0- 39.2= -39.2m/s and the ball will be well below the roof (if it hasn't already hit the ground!).
If you throw the ball upward from the roof at an intitial speed of
29.4 m/s, the CHANGE in speed after 4 seconds will be exactly the same: -39.2 m/s so its speed have decreased from 29.4: 29.4- 39.2 m/s
= -9.8 m/s and the ball will still be well above the roof.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top