Is Space Really Falling Faster Than Light Near a Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article Blackhole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the claim that space falls faster than light near a black hole, which is deemed incorrect and almost meaningless. The article references Andrew J. S. Hamilton's river model, comparing black holes to waterfalls, suggesting that once past the event horizon, one would fall toward the singularity faster than light. However, this assertion lacks a solid theoretical basis, as the nature of space and time inside a black hole remains unknown. The analogy of a waterfall is criticized for its inaccuracy in representing the complexities of black hole physics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity when discussing the behavior of space near black holes.
jobyts
Messages
226
Reaction score
60
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/04/27/falling.into.black.hole/index.html

In this article, in couple of places they mention about space moving faster than light. It's incorrect, right?


(from the article)
.
.
.
.
Hamilton also described them as places where space is falling faster than light.
.
.
.
Once you pass the horizon -- or go over Niagara Falls, in the waterfall analogy -- you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center -- called a singularity -- and feeling the effects, Hamilton said.
.
.
.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
space is falling faster than light
This assertion is almost meaningless. What is meant by "space falling"?

you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center

No one knows what happens inside a black hole - the assertion has no basis in any theory.
 
The article appears to be referring to Hamilton's river model-

'The river model of black holes'
Andrew J. S. Hamilton, Jason P. Lisle
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411060
 
"I think of a black hole as rather like a waterfall, except it's not a fall of water but rather a fall of space... Once you pass the horizon -- or go over Niagara Falls, in the waterfall analogy -- you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center -- called a singularity -- and feeling the effects,” Hamilton said.
mathman said:
This assertion is almost meaningless. What is meant by "space falling"?

The relative size and state and dimension of Niagara Black Hole Mass Falls is grossly inaccurate.
Place an electromagnetic barrier out from across lip of Niagara Falls.
matter.earth

“Mass sucks” is tighter fit.
Consider poor rubber ducky lost down black hole drain in verse fluent vortex.
The speed of vortex by black hole drain exceeds even speed by ducky waves.

Peace
ron

Please forgive.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...

Similar threads

Back
Top