Bungee Jumper Physics Lab Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a college physics lab involving a bungee cord experiment where a mass is hung from a bungee cord to measure its extension under varying forces. The goal is to calculate the minimum height required for the jumper to come within 5-10 centimeters of the floor, using energy conservation principles. The user seeks clarification on the non-linear behavior of the spring constant k, which appears to asymptotically approach 4 N/m but is estimated to be around 7 N/m when the jumper is attached. A suggestion is made to use a better regression model for the applied force as a function of deflection, and an integral approach is recommended for calculating the necessary height. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately determining k and suggests numerical methods for solving the problem.
flouran
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi,
So I have a final lab in my college physics class. And the lab procedure is as follows:
Procedure said:
Make or use a bungee cord by tying ten or eleven #19 latex rubber bands end-to-end. Attach the upper end high enough so that when 200 grams (0.2 kg) is hung from its lower end, it will almost touch the floor. Begin with a weight of about 0.2 N (0.0204082 kg) and measure the extension of the bungee cord as a function of the applied force up to a maximum extension of 1 to 12 meters. Also hang the Super Hero on the bungee cord and measure the resulting extension. The purpose is to predict, given a particular bungee cord, the minimum height above the floor necessary to ensure (or insure :razz:) that the jumper comes within 5-10 centimeters (0.05 to 0.1 meters) of the floor.
Note: The measured mass of the Bungee jumper is 0.25837 kilograms (258.37 grams).
I have attached my data as an Excel file:
View attachment AP Physics Post Lab.xls.
My question is, what formula does k follow (it is most definitely not linear)?

Homework Equations


Thus, once I find k, it should hopefully be easy to compute this minimum height using energy considerations (please let me know if I am somehow wrong):
U_i + K_i = U_f + K_f,
Since the object is released from rest,
mg(h_{min}-{L_0}) = mg(0.05)+0.5k(h_{min}-0.05-L_0)^2,
where h_{min} is the minimum height (the thing I need to calculate), m is the mass of the jumper = 0.25837 kg. L_0 is the initial length of the bungee which I measured to be 0.395 meters.

The Attempt at a Solution


In the attached Excel file I included a graph of the empirical computation of k (y-axis) versus the attached mass in kilograms (x-axis). As you can see, k asymptotically approaches 4 N/m, but is non-linear. I estimate k to be around 7 N/m if the bungee jumper is attached.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
flouran: I don't think I would bother with computing k, for the main calculations, although k is informative (for information only).

Your empirical data, although extremely coarse, suggests that a better regression would be P(x) = 17.24*x/(1 + 4.786*x - 1.886*x^2), where P(x) = applied force (N) as a function of x, and x = deflection (m). Thus, U11 + K1 = U12 + K2 + U22, where U1 = potential energy, and U2 = strain energy. Therefore,

m*g*h1 + 0 = m*g*h3 + 0 + integral[P(x)*dx],

where h1 = jumper initial height above ground, h3 = jumper final height above ground, and the integral is integrated from 0 to h2 - h3, where h2 = height of unstretched bungee cord lower end above ground (the unknown). Unless you can find an analytic solution to the above integral, which I did not attempt, you could solve the problem numerically, by trial and error, if you wish.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top