Astronaut's Kinetic Energy inside shuttle at liftoff

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy of astronauts during the space shuttle's liftoff. It clarifies that kinetic energy is determined by velocity, not acceleration, meaning astronauts have zero kinetic energy relative to the Earth at the moment of takeoff. As the shuttle accelerates during liftoff, the astronauts' kinetic energy increases, but it is initially zero at the moment of lift-off. The conversation also touches on the shuttle's acceleration, noting that it is slightly less than gravity at takeoff. Overall, understanding the relationship between kinetic energy and velocity is crucial for discussing astronaut safety during launch and landing.
ctamasi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm writing a report on the principles of physics and their application to the design of the astronaut space suit helmet. I have to discuss various factors that must be accounted for when designing it, and also, how it protects the astronaut during liftoff and landing.

My question is a really simple question, but I can't remember what the answer is;

When the space shuttle is lifting off, its acceleration is obviously high, which means that its kinetic energy is also high;

\vec{v} = \vec{a}\Deltat

EK = \frac{1}{2}mv2

does this mean that the kinetic energy of the astronauts inside the shuttle is also high? And if so, does this high kinetic energy have anything to do with body heat?

Thanks a lot guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ctamasi said:
When the space shuttle is lifting off, its acceleration is obviously high, which means that its kinetic energy is also high.
Kinetic energy is a function of velocity, not acceleration. The kinetic energy of an astronaut at the moment the shuttle takes off is exactly equal to that of a spectator on the ground watching the shuttle take off: Zero. (Relative to the Earth that is; since velocity is relative so is kinetic energy.)
 
Why do you say that the shuttle's acceleration is high? It isn't; at take-off, it's actually slightly less than the acceleration due to gravity.
 
Sorry I don't actually mean at the second the suttle lifts off, but what about during lift off, as its displacement is increasing. Or, what about when the shuttle passes through Earth's atmosphere?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top