Negative Derivative: Learn Meaning & Examples

AI Thread Summary
Negative derivatives, represented as \frac{\partial^{-1}}{\partial\,x^{-1}}, are often interpreted as anti-derivatives or indefinite integrals. This notation is less common and may require further exploration in the context of fractional calculus. The discussion suggests that the concept of a negative derivative could relate to the idea of an inverse operation in calculus. Participants are encouraged to investigate the relationship between negative derivatives and inverse functions. Understanding this notation can deepen comprehension of advanced calculus concepts.
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

What negative derivative means like this one:

\frac{\partial^{-1}}{\partial\,x^{-1}}

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I honestly have never seen such a notation but I would suspect the "inverse" derivative is the anti-derivative or indefinite integral. (I have seen this written "D-1 f" for anti-derivative.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top