How Does Changing the Axis Affect Angular Acceleration of a Disc?

AI Thread Summary
Changing the axis of rotation for a solid circular disc affects its angular acceleration due to the moment of inertia. The moment of inertia must be recalculated using the parallel axis theorem since the new axis is offset from the center. The initial moment of inertia was determined to be 0.103 kgm², and the new axis is parallel to the diameter but 0.15m away from the center. It is important to note that the orientation of the axis remains the same, only its position changes. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the new angular acceleration.
Elmowgli
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a little stuck on this question from a PPOD paper I am doing all help appreciated =)

Homework Statement


A solid circular disc of mass 6.6kg and radius 0.25m rotates about an axis which coincides with its diamter. Its angular acceleration is found to be 6.7rad/s. The axis of rotation is changed so that it lies 0.15m from the centre of the disc, and is parallel to the diameter. If the applied moment is the same, determine the angular acceleration.


Homework Equations


I=mR^2/4
I=rα


The Attempt at a Solution


ive worked out the moment of inertia of the disc before the axis is changed and get

I = 0.103kgm^2

I was wondering if the next step is simple to use I=rα and use 0.15 as the value for the radius or should I use the parallel axis theorem as the axis has changed from being perpendicular to parallel??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elmowgli said:
or should I use the parallel axis theorem as the axis has changed from being perpendicular to parallel??

You should use the parallel axis theorem, but that is not the correct reason why. You should use the parallel axis theorem because the new axis of rotation is parallel to one of the principal axes (the axes that pass through the centre of mass of the disc).

What you said is wrong because the orientation of the axis has not changed, only its position. Saying that it has gone from "perpendicular to parallel" makes no sense. It's oriented the same way as it was before (parallel to the diameter of the disc). The only difference is that now it is offset from the diameter by 0.15 m.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top