Trig integration (cos(x)+sin(x)) / sin(2x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpicyPepper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function \(\int \frac{cos(x) + sin(x)}{sin(2x)}dx\) simplifies to \(\frac{1}{2} \int (csc(x) + sec(x))dx\). The correct evaluation of \(\int csc(x) dx\) is \(-ln|csc(x) + cot(x)| + C\), not \(ln|csc(x) - cot(x)| + C\). The discussion highlights the equivalence of two forms of the integral, demonstrating that both yield the same result when graphed, despite the presence of absolute values. Participants emphasized the importance of recognizing different integral forms and their implications in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities, specifically \(sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)\)
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, particularly the integration of trigonometric functions
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties and their applications in calculus
  • Experience with graphing functions to analyze equivalence and behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of trigonometric functions, focusing on \(\int csc(x) dx\) and its variations
  • Explore the properties of logarithms in calculus, particularly in relation to integrals
  • Learn how to use graphing tools like Wolfram Alpha to verify integral equivalences
  • Review common trigonometric identities and their applications in calculus problems
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for calculus exams, educators teaching integral calculus, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of trigonometric integrals and their properties.

SpicyPepper
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Prepping for my test, and I can't seem to solve this problem.

Homework Statement



\int \frac{cos(x) + sin(x)}{sin(2x)}dx

Homework Equations



Not sure if it led me astray, but I used the trig. property:

sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



= \int \frac{cos(x) + sin(x)}{2sin(x)cos(x)}dx

= 1/2 \int(csc(x) + sec(x))dx

= 1/2ln|csc(x) - cot(x)| + 1/2ln|sec(x) + tan(x)| + C

= 1/2 ln|csc(x)sec(x) + sec(x) - csc(x) - 1| + C

I feel like this is wrong, but not sure where I'm messing up. Maybe my trig. property isn't the way to go.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me except you need + C.:cool:
 
I would keep the answer in the form of the line before the last one. There's one little mistake in that line, though.
∫cscx dx = -ln|cscx + cotx| + C, not ln|cscx - cotx|
 
Bohrok said:
I would keep the answer in the form of the line before the last one. There's one little mistake in that line, though.
∫cscx dx = -ln|cscx + cotx| + C, not ln|cscx - cotx|

Uhh...

LHS=ln\left(\frac{1}{cscx+cotx}\right)

=ln\left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{sinx}+\frac{cosx}{sinx}}\right)

=ln\left(\frac{sinx}{1+cosx}\right)


RHS=ln\left(\frac{1}{sinx}-\frac{cosx}{sinx}\right)

=ln\left(\frac{1-cosx}{sinx}\right)


Now, let's assume:ln\left(\frac{sinx}{1+cosx}\right)=ln\left(\frac{1-cosx}{sinx}\right)

ln\left(\frac{sinx}{1+cosx}\right)-ln\left(\frac{1-cosx}{sinx}\right)=0

ln\left(\frac{(\frac{sinx}{1+cosx})}{(\frac{1-cosx}{sinx})}\right)=0

ln\left(\frac{sin^2x}{1-cos^2x}\right)=0

ln\left(\frac{1-cos^2x}{1-cos^2x}\right)=0

ln(1)=0

Therefore, they are equivalent.
 
Graphically, it looks like they are the same if you ignore the absolute values. LHS - RHS looks like 0 on wolframalpha, but with absolute values, the graph of their difference is not 0.
 
I re-checked my work and didn't seem to find any errors or possibilities of extraneous solutions etc. so I graphed it as well, but on graphmatica. It seems that with or without absolute values, both functions are equal. If you believe you haven't made a mistake, please post a picture of what you see on wolfram :smile:
 
Ok, there is no difference between our integrals of cscx. I didn't recognize the other form immediately (I never worked with ∫cscx dx by itself either) so I thought it was wrong. Looking at the table of integrals in my calc book, I see that same integral, ln|cscx - cotx| and I did find it by looking on the internet, but apparently that form is not as common as the other one.

I learn something new almost every day on this site. :smile:
 
cool discussion guys. I just worked the integral of csc(x) on my own, and I came up with that funky version. Didn't realize it was less common :).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K