Gravitational Potential Energy of a rocket fired straight up

AI Thread Summary
A rocket fired straight up at half the escape velocity will reach a maximum height determined by gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations. The initial kinetic energy is given by 1/2mv^2, while the potential energy at the surface is -GMm/R. As the rocket ascends, its kinetic energy decreases to zero at the peak height, where the potential energy is -GMm/(R + h). To find the maximum height, one must equate the initial total energy to the potential energy at the peak. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between initial velocity and height, highlighting the need to apply gravitational equations correctly.
genPhysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket is fired straight up from the surface of the Earth at half the escape velocity. How high will it go relative to the surface of the earth?
Neglect dissipative forces.


Homework Equations



Uinitial + Kinitial = Uf

Kf is zero

G*m*M/radius^2 + 1/2mv^2 = -G*m*M/(2R)

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the above equations and I can solve for the initial velocity. I am stuck on how to find the height. Is it just 2R?

Many thanks...physics is a struggle for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the surface of the earth, PE = -GMm/R and KE = 1/2*m*v^2
At a certain height, KE = 0, and PE = -GMm/(R + h)
What is the expression for the escape velocity?
From that find the initial velocity.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top