Can we apply dynamics/system/chaos theory to the world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerenuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the applicability of various mathematical theories, such as chaos theory and complex systems, to real-world problems. While these theories provide insights into system behaviors, there is skepticism about their practical utility in improving life or making impactful predictions, particularly in areas like weather forecasting, financial markets, and disease spread. Participants highlight that many theories have been historically abstract but have led to significant advancements when applied, suggesting that research should not be solely demand-driven. The conversation emphasizes the importance of having theoretical tools available, even if their immediate applications are not clear. Ultimately, the potential of these theories to inform better decision-making remains a central concern.
Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
There are theories dealing with "systems" in an abstract general way, such as dynamical system theory (graph, topological), ergodic theory, chaos theory, catastrophe theory, complex systems, ...
All these theories have advanced mathematical results - mostly about existence or non-existence of properties. Many provide visually or conceptually nice examples.

But will these theories ever improve our life? I mean apart from giving justifications for behaviour we observe, will these theories make a difference?

I try to explain a bit more. Chaos theory can tell us that the weather is chaotic, but what can we now do about it with that knowledge? Can we detect chaoticity maybe and manipulate a system until we reach a non-chaotic regime? Or do methods of chaos theory only give statements once the exact mathematical model is known?

Can either of these theories be applied to a system like the financial market to make a prediction that can really make a difference (rather than explaning what has happened and what we now know anyway)?

In population dynamics, how can the models help us to make a difference if we wish to?

Or what do the models of disease spread give us? We know by observation that diseases can spread very quickly anyway. Do we need to knowledge from the mathematical models?

My important question is:
Which results from the "general theories of systems" give us some information to make better decisions, rather than just provide only an understanding the behaviour that we can observe anyway

I'm not a mathematician, but I might read up some topic, if I find good answers here :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can never know in advance whether a model is applicable at some time or not. QM didn't look useful at all, and then came semiconductors. GR was for theorists, and now we have GPS.

Many of these models you named are already applied to e.g. financial markets. You just don't know as long as you don't work e.g. for the Fed or a fund manager.

Geometry was an abstract and theoretical building for centuries, if not milleniums, before wave functions were used to explain physics and its applications in our modern world.

If we only would research on demand, we would always be behind. You don't construct a screwdriver when you needed it, you have it in your toolbox. And, yes, there will be probably some tools you never actually used. So?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top