SPHERICAL CAPACITOR - with two insulating shells

AI Thread Summary
A spherical capacitor consists of two insulating shells with different dielectric constants, positioned between inner and outer metallic shells. The problem involves calculating the potential difference between these shells, which can be approached by treating the system as three capacitors in series. The capacitances can be expressed using the dielectric constants and geometrical dimensions, leading to a combined capacitance equation. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the spherical capacitance formula and suggests using integrals for a more accurate calculation. Overall, the solution requires careful consideration of the dielectric properties and geometry to determine the potential difference accurately.
Grommit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
PLEASE HELP ASAP - Spherical capacitor

I could really use some help with this one, and I need to submit very soon...
Problem:
A spherical capacitor is made of two insulating spherical shells with different dielectric
constants K1 and K2 situated between two (inner and outer, shown by thick lines)
spherical metallic shells and separated by a vacuum gap. Geometrical dimensions of
the cross-section are as shown in figure 2. Outer metallic shell has charge +Q and the
inner metallic shell has charge −Q. What is the potential difference V between these
metallic shells?
Image: http://tinyurl.com/yazcvq2

If I am understanding this correctly, this can be interpreted as three capacitors connected in series. To that end, I thought I could utilize the equation for capacitors in series: 1/Ceq = 1/C1 + 1/C2 +1/C3. Then, Ceq=Q/V would indicate the potential difference. (Im thinking this may be flawed logic though).

Using K*(4*pi*Epsilon(0))*(a*b)/(b-a) for the spherical capacitances seems to be making a cumbersome mess of numbers more than anything.
Im starting to think now that maybe I should be setting up an integral along the lines of V=Q/(4*pi*Epsilon(0)) INTEGRAL (from a to b) db/b^2... hope that makes sense.
Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FWIW, I found the problem partially worked out in this manner:
Basically you have 3 capacitors in series, the first has a dielectric K2 with a thickness b -a, the second has a vacuum dielectric with a thickness c-b and the third capacitor with a dielectric K3 with a thickness d -c.
C1 = K2/(b-a), C2 = 1/(c-b), and C3 = K1/(d-c)
1/Ct = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3
1/Ct = (b-a)/K2 + (c-b) + (d-c)/K1
1/Ct = (K1(b-a) +K1(K2)(c-b) + K2(d-c))/K1(K2)
Ct = K1(K2)/(K1(b-a) +K1(K2)(c-b) + K2(d-c))
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...F112UmVhoyDA.YirA--&paid=add_comment#openions
However, this solution doesn't seem to have the variables for spherical capacitance included ==> K*(4*pi*Epsilon(0))*(a*b)/(b-a)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top