Physics problem with electrodynamics

kliker
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
hello dear friends, i have another problem in physics, it has to do with electrodynamics.

if we have a sphere with total loading Q which is uniformly distributed throughout it's volume, how can we find the voltage for R/2<=r<=R and for r>=R? (assume that we know E).

i know that Va - Vb = integral(ra/rb) of Edl

but I can't understand how to use it here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this is a good candidate for guass's law
 
lanedance said:
this is a good candidate for guass's law

it would be a good candidate (i guess) if we didnt know the value of E, but as i said we know E for (1) R/2<=r<=R and (2)r>=R

(1) E = k*Q*r/R^3
(2) E = k*Q/r^2
 
for r>=R/2

if we say V(inf) = 0

then for r > R/2

we will have

V(r) - V(inf) = Integral[r,inf] * Edl = (1/4p*eo)*Q/r

for r = R

we have V(R) = (1/4p*eo)*Q/R

so for r>=R/2

it will be V(r) = (1/4pe) * Q* (1/r - 1/R) ?

:S
 
you method looks reasonable, though I'm not so sure about the 2nd integration part...
kliker said:
for r>=R/2

if we say V(inf) = 0

then for r > R/2

we will have

V(r) - V(inf) = Integral[r,inf] * Edl = (1/4p*eo)*Q/r
so following what you have done, you mean for r>R and E = k*Q/r^2
V(r) = V(r) - V(\infty) = - \int_{\infty}^r \vec{E} \bullet \vec{dr} = - \int_{\infty}^r dr \frac{kQ}{r^2} = \frac{kQ}{r} <br />

note as the field is only dependent on r, we can differentiate reasonably easy & it gives the correct field, and the potential goes to zero as required, so we're looking good
\vec{E} = -\nabla V(r)= -\frac{dV(r)}{dr}\vec{\hat{r}} = \frac{kQ}{r}\vec{\hat{r}}

and fidning the correct offset potential for the edge of the sphere is
V(R)= \frac{kQ}{R}

kliker said:
for r = R

we have V(R) = (1/4p*eo)*Q/R

so for r>=R/2

it will be V(r) = (1/4pe) * Q* (1/r - 1/R) ?

:S

then for r<R, inside the sphere, integerate similar to before & carry the constant for V(R) so the potential is at the correct offset
V(r)-V(R) = - \int_{R}^r \vec{E} \bullet \vec{dr} <br />

now if you differentiate the potential you have found, you don't get the correct field, so i would look have a look at the integral again
\vec{E} = -\nabla V(r)= -\frac{d}{dr}( \frac{kQ}{r}-\frac{kQ}{R})\vec{\hat{r}}= \frac{kQ}{r^2}\vec{\hat{r}} ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top