Understand Sideral Time & Calculations - Sept.22, Nov.22, RA 2200 Hours

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borg
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Sideral Time is calculated based on local time on the autumnal equinox, with adjustments made for the months since that date. The formula includes adding two hours for each month past September 22, and Sidereal Time can also be expressed as the sum of Right Ascension and Hour Angle. However, it's important to note that Sidereal Time does not equal local time due to time zone differences, and a more accurate conversion requires accounting for the equation of time and local adjustments. The discussion emphasizes that for rough estimates, understanding the basics is sufficient before delving into more complex calculations. The aim is to enable observation of the celestial sphere without the need for equipment.
Borg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
4,888
I'm re-reading the calculations for Sideral Time and want to make sure that I've got the basics down. I want to make sure that I have grasped a few things though.

Sideral Time = local time on the autumnal equinox (Sept. 22)
Sideral Time = local time + (2hours * months since Sept. 22)
Sidereal Time = Right Ascension + Hour Angle

So, if I go outside at 6pm local time on Nov. 22, ST will be 1800 + 4 = 2200 hours. And anything directly overhead on my meridan at that time will have an RA of 2200 hours.

Did I get this right?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not quite. Sidereal time doesn't equal local time on the autumnal equinox because time zones differ by an integer number of hours, while the Sun's path across the sky is continuous. All you can say is that the apparent solar time on the autumnal equinox is roughly equal to sidereal time. To convert from apparent solar time to clock time, you'd have to first convert to mean solar time using the equation of time, then convert to clock time by accounting for time zone differences & location within a time zone.
 


OK, thanks. I should have been more liberal with the word approximate. The article that I was reading was discussing how to estimate the sidereal time to within a half-hour and didn't discuss time zones other than to mention DST. My first goal is to be able to stand outside without any equipment and approximately know where I'm looking on the celestial sphere.

So if we're only interested in a rough half-hour estimate, it sounds like I understand the basics and I can move on to the next level of reading with respect to the equation of time, position within a time zone, DST, etc.

Now if I could just spell sidereal correctly... :blushing:
 
Last edited:
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top