Time of motion, natural logarithm help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving time t as a function of displacement x from the given equation of motion, which involves a mass m and a damping constant b. The equation is transcendental, making it challenging to find an exact solution for t due to the logarithmic algebra involved. The user seeks a closed-form approximation to facilitate coding for a computer simulation that predicts the time down a ramp of known length xL. Additionally, a differential equation for acceleration is provided, which relates to the forces acting on the mass. The user is looking for assistance and tips on solving these equations effectively.
SystemTheory
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
This equation specifies displacement x in terms of motion time t (starting from rest).

x = \tau g\left(t + \tau e^{-t/\tau} -\tau\right)

where tau = m/b is the system time constant of a mass m suspended from a mechanical braking device with rectilinear damping constant b and g is standard gravity.

Can anyone help me find t as a function of displacement x? I'm having trouble with the logarithm algebra. I'm new to the forum, so any tips are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a trancendental equation for "t", you won't be able to find an exact solution.
 
Thanks for that help.

I'm trying to predict the time down a ramp of known length xL as shown in the diagram. I'd like a closed form approximation to write in a code statement. This will set the transient analysis time based on the input data inside a computer simulation.

The differential equation solved for acceleration looks like this:

\frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{mg sin\theta - bv}{m}

Any ideas appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • downramp.gif
    downramp.gif
    4.9 KB · Views: 495
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top