Ball coordinates to cartesian coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) to Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z). Users express confusion regarding the interchange of angles theta and phi in different contexts, particularly between physics and mathematics. Solutions provided for the given spherical coordinates are noted, but there is a call for clarification on the conversion process. A suggestion is made to visualize the problem through drawing or modeling to better understand the relationships between the coordinates. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent notation and understanding the underlying concepts in coordinate transformations.
martine
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I am struggeling with the following problem:

give the x,y,z coordinates from the following ball points/vectors

1. (r, theta, phi) = (sqrt3, 3/4pi, 3/4pi)

2. (r, theta, phi) = (1, 1/6pi, 1 1/6pi)

the sollutions I found in my reader are as followed:

1. (x, y, z) = (-1/2 sqrt3, 1/2 sqrt3, -sqrt3/sqrt2)

2. (x, y, z) = 1/4 sqrt3, -1/4, 1/2 sqrt3)

can someone explain to me what was actually done here? I understand the conversion from carthesian coordinates to ball and cylinder coordinates but I can't seem to find the sollution for the other way around. Thanks a lot.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
These equations might be of some use...
 
Muzza said:
These equations might be of some use...

Yep. It seems the angles \theta and \phi are interchanged though.
It's funny. In my physics books the azimuthal angle is always \phi and in most of my mathematics books it's \theta.
Oh well, guess it doesn`t matter as long as you're aware of it.
 
I would suggest that, instead of plugging this into a set of "conversion equations", you draw the situation (or even build a little model with a box) so that you see how the quantities are related. Once you do this with one problem, the second will be much easier.
 
Galileo said:
Yep. It seems the angles \theta and \phi are interchanged though.

It brings this up.

Unfortunately, the convention in which the symbols \theta and \phi are reversed is frequently used, especially in physics, leading to unnecessary confusion.

:P
 
That's because notation is not as important as meaning, but we must always specify.

Using astronomy language, I always used \theta for "declination" (angle from vertical axe) and \phi for "Right ascension" (angle from horizontal axe from left to right)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top