Writing down Mathematics with Arrays

AI Thread Summary
To write down array operations on paper, particularly for element-wise multiplication of matrices, the Hadamard or Schur product is used. When multiplying two matrices A and B element-wise to obtain a matrix C, the notation A · B = C can be misleading as it resembles the dot product. Clarity in notation is essential, and alternatives like A *_S B can be employed to specify the Schur product explicitly. The key is to ensure that the notation clearly communicates the operation being performed. Understanding the distinction between the ordinary product and the Schur product is crucial for accurate mathematical representation.
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I know how to do basic matrix operations, but sometimes I do calculations on computers and do array operations. How do I write down array operations on paper? For example, say I have two matrices, A and B, and I want to multiply them element by element.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you really want is the ordinary product at the top of the linked wiki article.
 
Integral said:
What you really want is the ordinary product at the top of the linked wiki article.

He seems to want to multiply them element-wise, which is was the Schur product is for.
 
So if I take the Schur product of A and B to get C, do I write

A \cdot B = C

As far as notation goes, this looks exactly like a dot product.
 
You can use whatever notation for you that you want. What's important is that you know you're talking about the Schur product. I've seen some people use A *_S B.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top