What Are the Concentrations of M2 and M3 in Electrolyte Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rodjav305
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectrometer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the molarity of solutions M1, M2, and M3 based on the dissolution of CuSO4.2H2O. The initial concentration M1 is determined from 4.500 grams dissolved in 250.0 mL of water. Subsequently, M2 is calculated using the dilution formula with 10.0 mL of M1 diluted to 25.00 mL. Finally, M3 is derived from diluting 50.00 mL of M2 to 75.00 mL. The thread also touches on classifying various compounds as strong electrolytes, weak electrolytes, or nonelectrolytes, seeking clarification on their behavior in aqueous solutions.
rodjav305
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ok so for the first part my questions I do not understand how to start it off.

1. Calculate the concentration in molarity. 4.500 grams of CuSO4.2H2O is dissolved in water to make 250.0 mL solution. The concentration is labeled as M1.





2. A student used 10.0 ml of M1 from problem# 1 and added water to make 25.00 mL of solution M2. Calculate the molarity of M2 ( use M1xV1=M2xV2).




3. A student used 50.00 mL of M2 from problem #2 and added water to make 75.00 mL of solutionM3. Calculate the concentration of M3.


Electrolytes-
1. Label the following compounds as strong electrolytes, weak electrolytes or nonelectrolytes.

1. KNO3-?
2. MgCl2-Strong
3. AlBr3-?
4. H2SO4-Strong
5. HCl-Strong
6. HNO3-Strong
7. HF-Weak
8. CH3COOH(acetic acid)-weak
9. CH3CH2OH (ethanol)-Non-electrolytes
10. Water-weak
11. Glucose (C6H12O6)-?

2. Which compounds are ions only in aqueous solutions?



3. Which compounds are molecules only in aqueous solutions?



4. Which compounds are both molecules and ions in aqueous solutions?

Any help is appreciated and If i did some problems wrong please correct me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rodjav305 said:
If i did some problems wrong please correct me.

My eyes hurt from trying, but I can't see any problem DONE.
 
Sorry about that, but no worries as I managed to do the problems myself.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top