Ice and Boiling Water Experiment: Discover the Surprising Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter BL4CKCR4Y0NS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boiling Ice Water
AI Thread Summary
When ice is placed at the bottom of a test tube filled with cool water and heated from the top, the water begins to boil while the ice remains unmelted for a significant time. This phenomenon occurs because thermal equilibrium takes time to establish, with convection playing a key role in heat distribution. Warmer, less dense water rises while cooler, denser water sinks, delaying the melting of the ice. If the heat source were applied to the bottom of the tube instead, the ice would melt more quickly due to enhanced convective mixing. The experiment highlights the importance of heat transfer dynamics in understanding phase changes in liquids.
BL4CKCR4Y0NS
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
"Ice In Boiling Water?"

If you nearly fill a test tube with cool water and then take a piece of ice and press it down on the bottom of the tube with a small weight, heat the test time with a flame that licks only the upper part of the tube, the water will start to boil sooner or later.But the ice at the bottom will not melt.

What's going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


BL4CKCR4Y0NS said:
If you nearly fill a test tube with cool water and then take a piece of ice and press it down on the bottom of the tube with a small weight, heat the test time with a flame that licks only the upper part of the tube, the water will start to boil sooner or later.But the ice at the bottom will not melt.

What's going on?

Well, first of all I don't think your last statement is strictly correct, I mean, the ice will melt eventually if you just leave it sitting out at room temperature .. you don't need the flame. However, assuming that you have a long enough tube to observe the effect you mention, all that is going on is that it takes time for the different regions to reach thermal equilibrium with each other. Thermal transport in gases and liquids takes place largely through the phenomenon of convection, where less-dense, warmer "packets" of material rise up while more-dense, cooler packets fall down, leading to mixing. In a narrow test tube, it could easily take more time for this to occur than for the water near the top of the tube to reach the boiling point.
 


Yeah I took it straight out of a book and didn't understand...

So basically it just takes more time for it to melt because heat rises and the ice is at the bottom. Yeah?
 


BL4CKCR4Y0NS said:
Yeah I took it straight out of a book and didn't understand...

So basically it just takes more time for it to melt because heat rises and the ice is at the bottom. Yeah?

Yes ... the situation would be different if you locally heated the bottom of the tube and had the ice at the top .. in that case, the convective mixing would be faster, since the heat transfer is going in the "favored" direction for convection .. sorry if that wasn't clear from the last post.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top