zynko said:
how do you guys know what equations to us? it's like the concept and math changes according to the shape of an object.
Here's what I did - note the analysis is only approximate.
First off, I modeled the disk as being infinitely thin and infinitely dense, to get rid of the third dimension.
For the first part of the problem, I assumed that the person was a height h above the infinitely dense disk, this would represent half the thickness of a more realistic disk of finite thickness. To get an estimate of the downwards force for a person standing on the disk, I integrated the force for a radius 'd=kh' around the person. This component will provide a pure downward force. It sets a lower bound on the downward force.
<br />
\int_{r=0}^{r=kh} 2\,{\frac {G\rho\,\pi \,r{\it dr}\,h}{ \left({h}^{2}+{r}^{2} \right) ^{3/2}}} <br />
Motivation: the mass of a circle element of radius r is 2 \pi \rho r dr. The distance of the person from this circular mass element is \sqrt{r^2+h^2}. F = G*m / r^2. The downward component gets multiplied by a factor of \frac{h}{\sqrt{r^2+h^2}}, this factor is 1 when r = 0, and goes towards zero as r increases, it is the sine of the angle if you draw the diagram (opposite side over hypotenuse). The lateral component cancels out.
The value of the integral is
<br />
2\,{\frac {G\rho\,\pi \, \left( -1+\sqrt {1+{k}^{2}} <br />
\right) }{\sqrt {1+{k}^{2}}}} <br />
The rapidity with which this force approaches a constant value 2 \pi G \rho argues that the ignored components are probably not too significant.
The above is a "good force" from the point of view of someone wanting to stand up and not slide along the disk.
To evaluate the force pulling a person sideways, towards the center of the disk, I ignored the height above the disk and evaluated the integrall
<br />
\int_{r=d}^{r=D}\int_{\theta=-\frac{pi}{2}}^{\frac{pi}{2}} {\frac {G\rho\,{\it dr}\,{\it d \theta}\,\cos \left( \theta \right) }{r} <br />
This is a rather crude approximation, but it sets an upper bounds on the sidewards force. It could probably be improved. It is an integral around a half-circe of radius r>d, r<D. The result is
<br />
2\,G\rho\,\ln \left( {\it \frac{D}{d}} \right) <br />
The integrals were all done via computer, which makes it both fairly easy to do, and less error-prone - except for setting them up, of course.