Calculating Power and Instantaneous Power - What's the difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaraphrax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between calculating power and instantaneous power in the context of a piston engine. Power is derived from the formula P = F * v, where force is related to pressure and velocity. Instantaneous power requires calculating torque instead of force when using angular velocity. The conversation also highlights the importance of averaging instantaneous power over a complete revolution to obtain a more accurate measure, suggesting that ordinary average power is preferable over RMS in this scenario. Understanding these calculations is essential for developing an effective MATLAB script for the given data.
Zaraphrax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm not a mechanical engineer, so please forgive my ignorance if this is obvious.

I have a set of data that I'm working with for a piston which gives me the crank angle and internal pressure inside the cylider as the piston cranks. I've been given stroke length, cylinder bore & that the measurements were taken at 1200 RPM.

I've been asked by a friend to write a MATLAB script which calculates and plots the power and the instantaneous power. However I cannot understand what the difference is between the two.

I know that power can be calculated using P = F * v (from which I've half figured out that F is the force applied to the piston multiplied by the pressure and V is the velocity, which would need to be in radians per second in our case). What to do with instantaneous power has me totally stumped, though.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is instantaneous power. I'm guessing he might also want to have RMS power over a full revolution.
 
K^2 said:
That is instantaneous power. I'm guessing he might also want to have RMS power over a full revolution.

Oh wow, that certainly makes more sense. How does one go about calculating the RMS power?
 
Actually, now that I think about it, you definitely want ordinary average, not RMS. Especially, if you have only a few cylinders.

Just take an average of instantaneous powers over some time interval. Ideally, you should take a whole number of revolutions as your interval. If it works well with one, I'd go with that. If it doesn't, try taking a few more. Depends on what exactly will be going on with the simulation, how stable it will be, etc.

By the way, if you are using radians/s for V, you should be using torque instead of force. It's either force * linear velocity, or torque * angular velocity for instantaneous power.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
58
Views
6K
Back
Top