Basic exercise for finding a Lagrangian from the Landau's Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Lagrangian for a simple pendulum with a pivot that rotates in a gravitational field, using Landau & Lifgarbagez's framework. The user presents their solution, which includes detailed calculations for kinetic and potential energy, leading to a Lagrangian that differs from the textbook answer. Key points include the importance of recognizing that Lagrangians can be ambiguous and the role of total derivatives in simplifying expressions. The user seeks clarification on their approach and the validity of their solution compared to the reference material. Understanding the total derivative concept is highlighted as crucial for reconciling the differences between the two Lagrangians.
Lurco
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Basic exercise for finding a Lagrangian from the Landau's "Mechanics"

Hello everyone!

Homework Statement


I've just started preparing for the classical mechanics course using only Landau & Lifgarbagez, so I'm doing everything according to their formulation.

And so I solved an exercise from the first chapter, but I'm not sure if I made that one correct (the answer is different, but a Lagrangian is ambiguous, isn't it?). The statement is:

Find the Lagrange function of a simple pendulum of length l, mass m, which pivot rotates along a circle of radius a with a constant frequency f in a homogeneous gravitational field with acceleration g.

Homework Equations


Formula for a Lagrangian of an isolated, one-particle system in 2 dimensions:
L=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^2+\dot{y}^2)+\textbf{F}\cdot \textbf{r}

The Attempt at a Solution


I first formulated a more general case:
- the pivot moves around a circle satisfying \alpha(t), (\alpha is the angle between the pivot's radius vector and the y-axis),
- the angle between the pendulum and y-axis is \phi(t),
- I've chosen the \alpha and \phi for the generalized coordinates of this system.

- the Cartesian coordinates of the mass are:
x=l \sin{\phi}+a \sin{\alpha}
y=l \cos{\phi}+a \cos{\alpha}

- the velocities:
\dot{x}=l \dot{\phi} \cos{\phi}+a \dot\alpha} \cos{\alpha}
\dot{y}=-l \dot\phi} \sin{\phi}-a \dot\alpha} \sin{\alpha}


U=-\textbf{F}\cdot \textbf{r}=-mgy=-mg(l \cos{\phi}+a \cos{\alpha})

T=\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x}^2+\dot{y}^2)=\frac{1}{2}m(l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 \textrm{cos}^2 \phi+a^2 \dot{\alpha}^2 \textrm{cos}^2\alpha+2 l a \dot{\phi} \dot{\alpha} \cos{\alpha}<br /> \cos{\phi}+l^2 \dot{\phi}^2 \textrm{sin}^2 \phi+a^2 \dot{\alpha}^2<br /> \textrm{sin}^2 \alpha+2 l a \dot{\phi} \dot{\alpha} \sin{\alpha} \sin{\phi})

L=T-U=m \left(\frac{1}{2}(l^2 \dot{\phi}^2+a^2 \dot{\alpha}^2)+l a \dot{\phi} \dot{\alpha} \cos{(\alpha-\phi)}+g(l \cos{\phi}+a \cos{\alpha}) \right)

-And now I substitute \alpha=\alpha(t)=f t, and my final solution is:
L=m \left(\frac{1}{2}(l^2 \dot{\phi}^2+a^2 f^2)+l a \dot{\phi} f \cos{(f t-\phi)}+g(l \cos{\phi}+a \cos{f t}) \right)

The answer in Landau & Lifgarbagez is:
L=\frac{1}{2}m l^2 \dot{\phi}^2+m l a f^2 \sin{(\phi-f t)}+m g l \cos{\phi}

So is my solution correct and if not, what mistakes am I making? I will be grateful for every answer. I will just add that I don't fully understand the idea of the "total derivative" which, as I suspect is crucial for comparing this two solutions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


A total derivative is where you differentiate everything as opposed to holding some variables constant. For example, say you have a function F(x,t) = x sin t, where x is a function of t. When you take the partial derivative, you hold x constant and get

\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} = x \cos t

With the total derivative, you allow for x to vary with t, so you'd get

\frac{dF}{dt} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{dt} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial t} = (\sin t)x&#039;(t) + x \cos t

So your Lagrangian has two extra terms that you can express as a total derivative with respect to time, namely

\frac{1}{2} ma^2f^2 + ag\cos ft = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{1}{2} ma^2f^2t + \frac{ag}{f}\sin ft\right)

so you can toss those terms. After doing that, I can almost transform their Lagrangian into yours by considering

\frac{d}{dt} [f \cos (\phi-ft)]

You can get the two Lagrangians to look almost exactly like each other. You just need to figure out if the remaining difference really matters or if you can somehow get it to go away.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top