How to Solve for C and F in a Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RanCor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
RanCor
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is the first time I've used this forum and i really could use someones help on how to solve for C in my formula instead of Xc

My formula is

Xc = 1 / (2PiFC) "Pi is, pi yea know, 3.14", (not 2 other unknowns)

Instead of solving for Xc i need to be able to solve for C and i don't know how to go about doing that...

any sort of help would be appreciated :)

Also... i looked down the page alilbit and i also need a formula on how to solve for F

If someone could show me how that's done so i wouldn't have to ask anyone anymore i would be very happy.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You mean, just solve for C or F?
Xc = 1 / (2PiFC)
Xc*(2PiFC) = 1
2PiFC = 1 / Xc
C = 1 / (Xc*2PiF)
F = 1 / (Xc*2PiC)
 
thank you very much :smile:
 
A quick note: It's not a good idea to post the same thread in more than one forum, unless you received no response from posting in one particular forum.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Understanding Cubic Equation Formula for Polynomials of Degree Three
Replies
9
Views
3K
I How to visualize the maths behind a formula?
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Solving a system of equations with 5 unknowns
Replies
10
Views
940
MHB Formula to find arc radius using arc length, chord length, and/or segment angle
Replies
4
Views
5K
MHB Standard formula for solving simultaneous equations of the form ax + by + c = 0
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB Solving g(x)-h(x) <0: Find a, b, c, d
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How to find the path if we only know the velocity (without common formulas)?
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Find an explicit formula for this n-sum problem
Replies
7
Views
3K
Solve 3 Degree Polynomials - No Formula?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Partial Differential Equation solved using Products
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top