Understanding Radiation Pressure and Its Role in Star Dynamics

AI Thread Summary
Radiation pressure is a crucial concept in star dynamics, despite confusion surrounding the traceless nature of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor. The tensor has one energy density component and three pressure components, leading to the conclusion that pressure is one third of the energy density. Although the trace of the tensor is zero, this does not imply that pressure components are null; rather, they are proportional to the energy density. This understanding clarifies how radiation can exert pressure when absorbed or reflected. The discussion effectively resolves the initial confusion regarding the relationship between the stress-energy tensor and radiation pressure.
TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
I would like to understand better the concept of radiation pressure, my main confusion comes from the fact that if the Stress-energy tensor for electromagnetic radiation is traceless, that would imply the pressure components of the tensor equal zero, and yet it's obvious radiation exerts pressure when absorbed or reflected and radiation pressure plays an important role in star dynamics.

I must be missing something really basic here, can someone explain this to me?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
The relativistic EM stress tensor in 4 dimensions is traceless. But there are 4 components to the trace... one energy density and three pressure. If you put that together, you find that the pressure is one third of the energy density.
 
nicksauce said:
The relativistic EM stress tensor in 4 dimensions is traceless. But there are 4 components to the trace... one energy density and three pressure. If you put that together, you find that the pressure is one third of the energy density.

So, I still don't get it, isn't it supposed to have the four components of the tensor vanishing, how can we make a proportion with quantities that are null? how can a zero pressure exert pressure? I'm stuck here.
 
What nicksauce is saying is that the stress-energy tensor of radiation looks like:
\begin{bmatrix}\rho&0&0&0\\0&-p&0&0\\0&0&-p&0\\0&0&0&-p\end{bmatrix}

With p = rho/3, the trace is zero.
 
phyzguy said:
What nicksauce is saying is that the stress-energy tensor of radiation looks like:
\begin{bmatrix}\rho&0&0&0\\0&-p&0&0\\0&0&-p&0\\0&0&0&-p\end{bmatrix}

With p = rho/3, the trace is zero.

Thanks, I see it now.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top