Deriving Equation (3) from A. Zee's "QFT in a Nutshell" Chapter I.5

  • Thread starter Thread starter kexue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving
kexue
Messages
195
Reaction score
2
In A. Zee "QFT in a nutshell" in chapter I.5 on page 31 how does equation (3) come about? Just the line above this equation, he gives an equation which needs to be rearranged to give (3). It must be embarrassing simply, but I can't see how. Something with the indices goes on. How does the -g-kk/m^2 gets on the numerator, why and how kk/m^2??

If you don't own the book, http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7573.pdf" with page 31 and equation (3).

thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to multiply both sides of the previous equation by

-g_{\mu\rho} + k_{\mu} k_{\rho} / m^2
 
thanx hamster143!

Another equation bothering me is (5) in chapter I.10 on page 78. It's the matter action expanded to first order in h. I can't see clearly how eq. (4) and (5) go toegther. What happens to the tensor density -g in (4), it does not appear in (5)? What is the first term on the RHS, the matter action where h=0? Any hints?

thank you again
 
Use -g=1+\eta^{\mu\nu}h_{\mu\nu}+O(h^2). Thus
(-g)^{-1/2}=1-\eta^{\mu\nu}h_{\mu\nu}/2+O(h^2).
 
Wow that was fast, thanks a lot arkajad!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top