Probability of Hitting Vertical vs Horizontal Lines in 2D Grid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of hitting a positive vertical barrier versus a negative horizontal barrier in a 2D grid, starting from the origin. The user believes that the symmetry of the problem allows for a simplification of the probabilities, suggesting that the probability of hitting a negative horizontal line is equivalent to that of hitting a positive vertical line. They seek clarification on whether their assumptions about these relationships are correct and request guidance on how to approach proving or solving the initial problem. Additionally, they express interest in exploring the case where both barriers are positive. The inquiry emphasizes a conceptual understanding rather than a straightforward solution.
iamback
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a problem

(1) where I need to compute the ratio of probabilities of hitting and stopping at a positive vertical barrier x vs hitting and stopping at a negative horizontal barrier y after starting from (0,0).

I feel that by symmetry, the answer to this would be the same as

(2) The probability of hitting -y vs hitting +x, horizontal lines in 2d grid,

which looks like being same as

(3) The probability of hitting -y vs x on a real line.

Can someone please tell me if my 1->2 assumption or 2->3 assumption is wrong. In which case, could someone please tell me how to proceed with the solution to 1.

However, if my assumption is right, can someone tell me how to proceed to prove it. Also, what would be a way to solve the case when both x and y are positive.



I shall be grateful for a response/hint/link.

Thanks.
PS: Please note that this is NOT a homework question and I really want to see this problem from a conceptual perspective. I've asked this question of many people, but none seem to be able to answer it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think the issue is that (1) can be interpreted several ways. Could you provide more detail?
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top