Difference between the 2 bases pairs

  • Thread starter Thread starter scope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bases Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the chemical differences between DNA base pairs CG and AT, noting that G and C form three hydrogen bonds, making GC pairs more stable than AT pairs, which form two. This stability affects gene expression and DNA replication, as GC-rich regions can lead to replication slippage. While higher GC content is often associated with stability, DNA must also remain flexible for replication, leading to a balance in base pair abundance. In RNA, the single-stranded nature allows for folding and base-pairing, contributing to the stability and functionality of mRNAs, particularly in regions with higher GC content. The ease of breaking A-T pairs during replication is due to their lower hydrogen bond count, which requires less energy to separate.
scope
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hi,

i wonder if there is any clear chemical difference between the bases pairs CG and AT? is one more reactive than the other one for example? is there any chemical difference that is used? i would be very grateful for any reply!

thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
G and C form three hydrogen bonds, A and T form two, and they both differ in the display of (partially) charged groups in the grooves.
 
wonderful, and what are the chemical consequences for this? more stability for one ? can you tell me anything like this? this seems so fascinating!
 
GC pairs are indeed more stable, and the difference in groove display allows specific enzymes to recognise specific DNA sequences, very useful for controlling gene expression.

There are also chemical consequences of the order of the base pairs, e.g. GC repetitions can cause 'slipping' of the DNA replication machinery and thus cause the size of the repetition to vary in subsequent divisions.
 
wonderful. but then if they are most stable, maybe CG is more abundant than AT? since stability is related to abundance?
 
Well, you must take into account that DNA has to be able to open its strands in order to replicate or produce an mRNA molecule. Therefore, too high stability is detrimental. In organisms living at higher temperatures, there is a bias towards G/C instead of A/T in certain parts of the genetic code.
 
wonderful! does the same occur for RNA if we compare CG and AU?
 
scope said:
wonderful! does the same occur for RNA if we compare CG and AU?

RNA is more complicated because it normally is "single" stranded. However, it can fold back on itself providing more stability through base-pairing. This can increase the shelf-life of mRNAs or adds the functionality to functional RNAs.

I reckon, if you were to look, you'd find a higher GC content to functional RNAs or mRNAs (particularly in the 5' and 3' NCRs) with long shelf lives. Its also compounded by proteins which bind RNA can increase their longevity.
 
This is also valid for RNA/DNA hybrids, as seen in polyA tracts at the end of mRNA molecules. Since these are thermodynamically less stable, the mRNA strand can more easily release from the DNA template. Of course, this has evolved to exert multiple functions throughout time, but it's unofficially generally accepted that this was the original reason for the terminating polyA sequence.
 
  • #10
Helicases, which are a class of enzymes,start splitting the DNA apart during replication at places rich in A-T pairs because they form 2 hydrogen bonds compared to 3 of G-C bonds. Therefore they are easier to break and require less energy.
 
Back
Top