Resonance/energy levels contributing structures

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDTea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Structures
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of resonance in organic chemistry, particularly in the context of carbon-carbon double bonds as described in Robert B. Grossman's "The Art of Writing Reasonable Organic Reaction Mechanisms." The user expresses confusion about Grossman's definition of "higher energy" structures and whether it aligns with the concept of resonance as degenerate solutions in quantum mechanics. They suggest that Grossman's examples may serve more as illustrative tools rather than definitive representations of resonance. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on how energies of various resonance structures are calculated, emphasizing that resonance is not limited to structures of equal energy. The user recommends exploring works by Linus Pauling and the classic "Quantum Chemistry" for deeper theoretical insights.
DDTea
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I'm working my way through The Art of Writing Reasonable Organic Reaction Mechanisms by Robert B. Grossman (excellent book, by the way), but the way he describes resonance is confusing me. I feel like the more I think about it, the more confusing it gets.

Consider a carbon-carbon double bond: C=C. He says that there are a few different ways that the pi electrons can be distributed in this bond:

C=C
(-)C--C(+)
(+)C--C(-)
.C--C.

Where the last structure is a radical. Although some of those structures are theoretically possible, they would offer a poor description of the behavior of the C=C . So, he develops a set of rules for which theoretical contributing structures are higher in energy and thus poorer descriptions of the chemical behavior.

So my question is, is this definition of "higher energy" a literal definition? Or am I misunderstanding the definition of resonance: degenerate solutions for the energy term in the Schrodinger equation--i.e., of equal energy!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If he is using an isolated double bond to describe resonance it is only being used in the form of an object lesson. ie. you might draw a double bond in the following ways...
just as you might draw resonance structures in the following ways. How the energies of the various representations are calculated, if not discussed by Grossman, can be assumed to be by one of the various MO methods that are accurate enough to provide a relative ranking.
 
The different structures correspond best to a set of valence bond structures. You can now form a matrix representaiton of your molecular hamiltonian using these structures as a basis. The diagonal matrix elements will be the "energies" of the hypothetical isolated structures. The importance of a given structure in the real wavefunction of the molecule depends not only on tihs energy but also on the value of the non-diagonal matrix elements. However it is important that resonance is not restricted to structures of the same energy.
These concepts should be exposed in the books by Linus Pauling, or, on a more theoretical basis in the classic book "quantum chemistry" by Eyring Walter and Kimball.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top