Solving Large Equations with wxMaxima - What is up with %r1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sparky_
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using wxMaxima to solve a set of equations with large coefficients, where the user encounters the output %r1 in the results. This notation typically indicates that the system has infinitely many solutions, with %r1 representing a free parameter. The user expresses some confidence in specific outputs but seeks clarification on the meaning of %r1. Additionally, there is a request for recommendations on free software that can handle solving multiple equations with large numbers. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding wxMaxima's output for effective problem-solving.
Sparky_
Messages
227
Reaction score
5
I have a set of several equations -

The coefficients are rather large.

I thought I would be smart and not go through all the mess of solving them by hand

I have used wxMaxima some and carefully entered each equation into wxMaxima - using its Solve function

I'm getting:

[[X1=-230942730/(%r1-23900000),
X2=112626/3125,
Tx1=%r1,
Tx2=333975528125/18771]]

what is up with the %r1?

For what it's worth the Tx2 - I feel pretty good about that number it seems about what I would expect, X2 - I could believe that number - not too bad from my gut feel.

anybody here use wxMaxima and know about this?

OR

Can anybody suggest a "free" software package that could solve ~ 7 equations 7 unknows with large numbers?

-Sparky
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
algsys([2*x+y=10, 3*x+2*y=17], [x,y]);
Solves 2x+y=10 and 3x+2y=17 for x=3 and y=4.

If your equations are linear, you can use linsolve in place of algsys, for a slight speed increase.

Could you post the command you tried?
 
I used "Solve" in wxMaxima.
 
Post it with the arguments you used. Otherwise, I can't tell why it output %r1.
 
Last edited:
Sparky_ said:
I have a set of several equations -

The coefficients are rather large.

I thought I would be smart and not go through all the mess of solving them by hand

I have used wxMaxima some and carefully entered each equation into wxMaxima - using its Solve function

I'm getting:

[[X1=-230942730/(%r1-23900000),
X2=112626/3125,
Tx1=%r1,
Tx2=333975528125/18771]]

what is up with the %r1?

For what it's worth the Tx2 - I feel pretty good about that number it seems about what I would expect, X2 - I could believe that number - not too bad from my gut feel.

anybody here use wxMaxima and know about this?

OR

Can anybody suggest a "free" software package that could solve ~ 7 equations 7 unknows with large numbers?

-Sparky

Usually the %r1 indicates that your system has infinitely many solutions - this is WxMaxima's way of writing them in parametric form: %r1 is the single free parameter.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top