Do you have a personal reference book? Share tips on creating one!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Livethefire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Reference
AI Thread Summary
Creating a personal reference book can be highly beneficial for compiling useful formulas and information tailored to individual needs. Many users emphasize the advantage of having a personalized compilation, as it allows for better retention and easier navigation of material learned over time. While some acknowledge the availability of popular handbooks, they argue that personal notebooks can include unique formulas not typically found in textbooks. The discussion also highlights the relevance of such books in an age dominated by digital resources, noting their portability and reliability during power outages. Ultimately, a personal reference book serves as a valuable tool for efficient learning and quick access to essential information.
Livethefire
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
(feel free to move this post if it doesn't belong here)

I've been searching around the internet and here for the past few days and can't find anything relating to this.

Does anyone keep a personal notebook wherein they have complied useful formulas and such for reference? If so I would love to hear tips on how they ever started to create such a book.

I know you can buy books like that, but if you created it yourself things would stick better and you would have exactly all you need in there plus room for expansion.

The reason I ask is simple, I think it is about time I begin compling such a book because frankly I believe it would be tremedously helpful, particularly if you learned a topic once and then have to come back to it later etc.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a problem with personalized compilations - different people require, in general, different formulas depending on their background, what they do research in, what they work with, etc... but the most usual formulas are found in popular handbooks, such as https://www.amazon.com/dp/0071548556/?tag=pfamazon01-20 (this one is an updated version of the Abramowitz/Stegun handbook).

I personally haven't created my own formula handbook, I just use the first one, pretty much anything I need is there. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good thread.

Yes such a compilation is obviously intensely personal, but many starting out can't afford a copy of the Rubber book, CRC handbook or Kempe's for isntance.

It's all less important these days of personal computers, spreadsheets simulators the internet and whatnot.

But one set I still use occasionally from the days long ago when I did a lot of audio design work.
I compiled a set of tables of current, voltage and power (Peak and RMS) for various impedances.

go well
 
Yeah I agree that what I am referring to is "personal", but in my view that is why it may be advantageous. Instead of having a standard book with possibly a lot of bloat a personal one will display the material to your own likeing and style that you may have learned it. Naviagating the book may then be a breeze and maybe stick in your mind better since you created it.

Maybe you particularly liked the flow of a handful of textbooks in various disciplines, then you compile important results/formulas in a personal notebook so that you can just take that with you instead of needing many textbooks. Of course this example could be taken to the extreme but, that in essense is what I am talking about.

I do agree however that in the edge of computers and the internet this type of thing might be a tad redundant. However (call me old fashioned) it may be hard to beat a book - consider power outages, portability (in some cases) etc etc.
 
One type of formula that is useful to record in such a form are those that you do not normally find in a textbook, but come across from time to time.

As an old dog I did try to pass on such in another forum by starting a "tips and tricks" thread with the little gem below, but unfortunately the thread developed a deal of moss. For a personal record you could filter the moss out.

A very simple but useful formula for making a non standard resistor by adding a parallel resistor to a standard one.

{R_1} = \frac{{{R_2}{R_D}}}{{{R_2} - {R_D}}}


R1is the required shunt resistor

RD is the desired non preferred value

R2 is the (next) higher preferred value
 
Thats actually an excellent point! Its happed to me quite alot... I look for a long time for a particular expression that I learnt, or liked to use in a topic and can't find it in any textbook, I have to say that is quite frustrating, but a personal reference would get around that problem entirely.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top