Contravariant metric components

michael879
Messages
696
Reaction score
7
I realize this is a "simple" mathematical exercise, in theory, but I'm having a lot of trouble finding some algorithmic way to do it. The problem is this: I want to expand the contravariant metric tensor components g^{\mu\nu} in terms of the covariant metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}. The first order calculation is very simple, but the second order one seems incredibly tedious and error prone. Could someone either show me this expansion to at least 2nd order or direct me to a source that does? I'm trying to do some stuff with quantum gravity and I don't want to spend all this time on such a trivial problem if the answer is already out there (I have looked).

Also, here is the method I have been using:
g^{\lambda\mu}g_{\mu\sigma} = \delta^\lambda_\sigma
g^{\mu\nu} \equiv \eta^{\mu\nu} + sqrt(G)*h^{\mu\nu}
g_{\mu\nu} \equiv \eta_{\mu\nu} + sqrt(G)*h_{\mu\nu}

and then just use the resulting formula to calculate the contravariant h in terms of the covariant h order by order (use all possible combinations of h, \eta, and \partial for each order of h and assign some constant that will be solved for). The problem is that the number of terms at each order grows very fast.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's do it in matrix form first and then put the indices in. Let N = ημν, H = hμν, and G = gμν.

G = (N + H)-1 = ((I + HN-1)N)-1 = N-1(I + HN-1)-1 = N-1 - N-1HN-1 + N-1HN-1HN-1 + ...

Therefore

gμν = ημν - ημαhαβηβν + ημαhαβηβγhγεηεν + ...
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top