BOLTZMAN'S cONSTANT and Thermal laws.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average kinetic energy of helium and argon gas molecules at a temperature of 121°C using Boltzmann's constant. It highlights that while the average energy per particle is proportional to the product of Boltzmann's constant and temperature, it is not simply that product due to the presence of multiple degrees of freedom in the system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of the Equipartition Theorem, which states that kinetic energy is distributed equally among the various degrees of freedom. It notes that helium and argon are monatomic gases, simplifying the calculation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the average kinetic energy of the gas molecules.
notsam
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A cylinder contains a mixture of helium and
argon gas in equilibrium at a temperature of
121 C.
Boltzmann’s constant is 1.38066 ×
10−23 J/K, and Avogadro’s number is 6.02 ×
1023 mol−1. What is the average kinetic energy of each
type of molecule?
Answer in units of J.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

I think that the awnser is just simply taking the temperature and multiplying it my Boltzman constant, but that seems to simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
notsam said:

The Attempt at a Solution

I think that the awnser is just simply taking the temperature and multiplying it my Boltzman constant, but that seems to simple.

You're close -- the average energy per particle will be proportional to kBT, but not exactly equal to it. I think that you're just missing an important concept. Here is that concept: in a system of particles, there are many degrees of freedom, meaning that there are many different modes that can contribute to the internal kinetic energy of the system. There is translational kinetic energy (i.e. energy of particles moving from one place to another). In the case of a monatomic gas, that's it. Since each particle in the gas consists of single atom, all the particles can do is move around. There are three translational degrees of freedom corresponding to the three independent directions through space in which particles can move. In the case of a gas in which each particle of the gas is a molecule consisting of more than one atom, those molecules can also vibrate and rotate. So, you have additional modes or degrees of freedom in which kinetic energy can be present (in this case kinetic energy due to vibrational and rotational motion). Now, the question is, on average, how is the total kinetic energy of the system split up amongst these various degrees of freedom? The answer is given by a theorem known as the Equipartition Theorem. If you read this small section from the Wikipedia article about it, it should give you all the information you need to answer your question.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipartition_theorem#Translational_energy_and_ideal_gases

As you probably already guessed just from the name of the theorem, it turns out that the total kinetic energy is split up (partitioned) equally amongst the degrees of freedom in the system.

EDIT: I know that helium exists as monatomic gas (each particle in the gas is a single helium atom). This is in constrast to other examples like hydrogren, which is a diatomic gas (each particle is a molecule consisting of two H atoms bonded together -- H2). I believe that argon, being a noble gas just like helium, probably also exists in monatomic form. That makes this question particularly simple.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top