Galileo's Experiment: Uniformly Accelerated Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter batballbat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
Galileo's experiment demonstrated that the distance covered by a body in free fall is proportional to the square of time, indicating uniformly accelerated motion, as acceleration is defined as the second derivative of distance over time. The discussion highlights that in non-uniformly accelerated motion, distance does not follow this time-squared relationship. Galileo concluded that the acceleration is constant for all bodies by conducting multiple experiments with various objects, consistently observing the same acceleration value regardless of mass. This empirical evidence supports the idea that acceleration due to gravity is uniform across different objects. Overall, Galileo's findings laid the groundwork for understanding uniform acceleration in physics.
batballbat
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
1. how can the experimental result that the distance covered by a body during free fall is directly proportional to the square of time imply that the motion is uniformly accelerated? (of course the result agrees with one of a property of uni. accelerated motion but can we show that in nonuniformly accelerated motion the distance is not proportional to time squared?)

2. galileo showed that for a free fall is uniformly accelerated. but how did he show that the acceleration which is constant for a body is same for all other bodies? (i know the statement is implied from the Newtons second law. but how did galielo conclude it?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. This one's easy! d(t) = kt2, and acceleration is defined as the second derivative of d(t), which is a constant.

2. I'm not sure he did. I know he showed you get the same acceleration independent of the mass.
 
2) Very simple: He did the experiment many times using many diffrerent objects and always got the same value for the acceleration.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top