What combinations satisfy this complex exponentiation property?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bruno67
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the product [(\pm ia)(\pm ib)]^{-\alpha} and its equivalence to (\pm ia)^{-\alpha} (\pm ib)^{-\alpha} for various combinations of signs. It establishes that the property holds for the combinations (+,+), (+,-), and (-,+), but fails for the combination (-,-). The failure in the (-,-) case is attributed to the presence of the factor (-1)^{2\alpha}, which disrupts the equality. The conclusion is that the logarithmic properties are key to determining when the exponentiation property is satisfied.
bruno67
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have the product

[(\pm ia) (\pm ib)]^{-\alpha}
wherea, b, \alpha >0. For which of the combinations (+,+), (+,-), (-,+), and (-,-) is the following property satisfied?

[(\pm ia) (\pm ib)]^{-\alpha}=(\pm ia)^{-\alpha} (\pm ib)^{-\alpha}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Bruno67! :smile:

Using the definition of exponentiation we have that

[(\pm ia)(pm ib)]^{-\alpha}=e^{-\alpha Log((\pm ia)(\pm ib))}

So the question becomes when

Log((\pm ia)(\pm ib))=Log(\pm ia)+Log(\pm ib)

Solve this using the definition of the logarithm.
 
Thanks, so it holds in all cases except the (-,-) one. In that case we have

[(-ia) (-ib)]^\alpha = (-ia)^\alpha (-ib)^\alpha (-1)^{2\alpha}.
 
Indeed!:smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top