How do constraint equations in mechanics work?

AI Thread Summary
Constraint equations in mechanics relate the length of a string to the positions of attached blocks, allowing for the differentiation of length to derive velocity and acceleration. These equations are scalar relations that apply universally across different coordinate systems and can be used in both fixed and moving frames of reference. They are geometric in nature, contrasting with physics equations like F=ma, which depend on the specific accelerations of each pulley. Constraint equations are applicable to various pulley-string-block arrangements, not just those with blocks moving in opposite directions. Overall, they provide essential relationships that simplify the analysis of mechanical systems.
Ashu2912
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
How do constraint equations in mechanics work?

Hi, friends! I'm having some trouble understanding the constraint equations:-

(1) How do they relate the length of the string to the position of the block attached to it? The position of the block must be a vector and it must be differentiated to get the velocity and then the acceleration. However in my book, they have just differentiated the length of the string, which they have taken as the position of the block, to get the velocity and then the acceleration...

(2) Are they scalar or vector relations?

(3) Are the with always derived with respect to some fixed frame of reference?

(4) If no in question (3), do we consider relative velocities/accelerations in moving pulleys, like acceleration of block with respect to pulley, and then use the relative velocity/acceleration equation?

(6) Are they applicable to all kinds of pulley-string-block arrangements, because I was under the impression that it is applicable only if the blocks move in opposite directions...

(7) Are constraint equations coordinate system and origin (fixed) dependent, or are they general relations applicable in all (fixed) coordinate systems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ashu2912! :smile:

The only difference between a constraint equation and eg a conservation equation is that a conservation equation is physics, but a constraint equation is geometry.

With eg a system of three pulleys at heights p q and r, we get physics equations (usually F = ma) for each pulley,

but the "a" in F = ma is different for each pulley

(in fact, it's p'' q'' and r'' respectively)

so we need a geometric equation relating p q and r …

usually this simply tells us the length of the string in terms of p q and r …

(we can also have eg a https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=632" constraint equation, relating the linear speed and angualr speed of a rolling object)

since we know that that length is constant, we can differentiate once (or twice) to get a neat "constraint equation". :wink:

(which will be a scalar equation, applicable to all kinds of pulley-string-block arrangements, and since it depends on the length of the string it's the same in all coordinate systems)

if that's not clear, can you ask about a constraint equation for a specific system?
 
Last edited by a moderator:


1) in constraint relationship we diffrentiate length of string only(though i might be wrong but i have encounterd only such ques)

2)these are vectors(as diff gives negative and positive velocities)

3,4) as it is pure kinematics u can take ant frame of refrence inertial or non inertial

6) can be applied to any question even simple questions can be done through this

7) i don't know what you mean
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top