Explicitly Solving a PDE: Is There a Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clever-Name
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the explicit solution of the partial differential equation (PDE) given by (x+y)u_{x} + yu_{y} = 0 with initial condition u(1,y) = \frac{1}{y} + ln(y). The method of characteristics was applied, leading to the conclusion that while a general solution U(t) = f(s) exists, it is impossible to explicitly solve for the parameter s. The participants conclude that the problem likely has no explicit solution due to the noncharacteristic nature of the initial conditions along the line y=1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of characteristics
  • Knowledge of initial value problems in PDEs
  • Basic calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of characteristics in-depth for solving PDEs
  • Explore noncharacteristic initial conditions and their implications
  • Learn about alternative methods for solving PDEs, such as separation of variables
  • Investigate the existence and uniqueness theorems for PDE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying partial differential equations, as well as researchers exploring the characteristics method and initial value problems.

Clever-Name
Messages
378
Reaction score
1
I just had a 'quiz' in my PDE class today and there was a problem my friends and I are convinced has no explicit solution. I want to know if maybe we are doing something wrong?

Homework Statement


(x+y)u_{x} + yu_{y} = 0 [/itex]<br /> <br /> u(1,y) = \frac{1}{y} + ln(y) [/itex]&lt;h2&gt;Homework Equations&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;br /&gt; ...&lt;h2&gt;The Attempt at a Solution&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Here was my approach via method of characteristics:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{dy}{dt} = y \to y(t) = Se^{t}&lt;br /&gt; y(t=0) = S&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{dx}{dt} = x+y&lt;br /&gt; x&amp;amp;#039;-x = Se^{t}&lt;br /&gt; Via integrating factor we arrive at:&lt;br /&gt; x(t) = Ste^{t} + g(s)e^{t}&lt;br /&gt; x(t=0) = 1 \to 1 = g(s)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Thus we are left with:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; x(t) = Ste^{t} + e^{t}&lt;br /&gt; and&lt;br /&gt; y(t) = Se^{t}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You can check for yourself that the following is true:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{dU(x(t),y(t))}{dt} = (x+y)u_{x} + yu_{y} = 0&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Thus our general solution is:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; U(t) = f(s)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; A general function of s.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; However, we have found that it is impossible to explicitly solve for s. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect the problem cannot be solved. Along the initial line y=1 you can differentiate the initial conditions and get

u_y(1,y)=-1/y^2+1/y=(y-1)/y^2=0

that you can substitute back into the PDE in order to obtain u_x

(x+1)u_x=0 → u_x=0

which means u(x,y)=u(y). Hence, u(x,y) should be equal to the initial conditions everywhere. But this is not true, as one can check substituting
u_x=0 into the PDE:

yu_y=y(1-y)/y^2=0

true only when y=0 or y=1.

I am not an expert of the method of characteristics, but I believe the curve on which the initial conditions are given is "noncharacteristic".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K