How Do You Correctly Derive the Equation of a Parabola with a Horizontal Axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ashu2912
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
To derive the equation of a parabola with a horizontal axis and vertex at (h,k), the origin is shifted to (h,k), resulting in the equation y² = 4ax in the new coordinate system. The transformation back to the original system involves replacing x with (x-h) and y with (y-k), leading to the equation (y+k)² = 4a(x+h). However, to correctly transform a parabola with a vertical axis to one with a horizontal axis, a rotation of the coordinate system is necessary, rather than just shifting the origin. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the desired form of the new parabola. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurate derivation.
Ashu2912
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Hi! I am trying to find the equation of a parabola with vertex as (h,k) and axis parallel to the x-axis. However, I am not able to derive the correct result.
(1) I shift the origin to the point (h,k).
(2) Now the equation of the parabola in the new system becomes y^{2} = 4ax.
(3) Now, we know that when we shift the origin without rotation of axes to a point (h,k) (wrt the old system), the locus in the old system is changed by replacing x by x-h and y by y-k. This gives us the equation of the locus in the new system.
Now, since the equation of the parabola in the new system is y^{2}=4ax, then the equation of the parabola in the old system must be (y+k)^{2} = 4a(x+h), as on replacing x by x-h and y by y-k in this equation, we get the equation of the parabola in the new system, which is y^{2} = 4ax.
Please help in finding the fault in this derivation. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you want to transform a parabola whose axis is along the y-axis ( f(x) = 4a x^2 ) to one whose axis is parallel to the new x-axis? You will have to rotate the coordinate system, not simply move the origin. What form do you want the new parabola to take?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top