Understanding Newton's Second Law: How kgm/s2 Relates to Force

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter -Physician
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newton
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
14 replies · 6K views
-Physician
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Okay, so if we have the work Formula:
##A=Fd## we have units: ##N*m## which gives us joule ##J##,
but if we have the formula of the force:
##F=\frac{mv}{t}## we would have ##\frac{kg * \frac{m}{s}}{s}## which gives us ##kg \frac{m}{s^2}##, so does that give Newton?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, because kg = mass and m/s^-2 = acceleration so... mass x acceleration = Force
 
So formula ##F=\frac{mv}{t}## gives us formula ##F=ma## or ##F=ma## gives us ##F=\frac{mv}{t}## ?
 
-Physician said:
So formula ##F=\frac{mv}{t}## gives us formula ##F=ma## or ##F=ma## gives us ##F=\frac{mv}{t}## ?
That's about right, just the variation is missing. I assume that you know that acceleration is the variation of velocity over time. Dimensional analysis doesn't provide that kind of information.

Newton's second law is that F ~ dp/dt with p=mv
 
sophiecentaur said:
How not??
Acceleration: ST-2
Again: it doesn't provide the information about v/t vs. dv/dt.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Same units same dimensio. Even same value for uniform acceleration. What probem do you have?
I have no problem.
 
[tex] \frac{d v}{d t} = \lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} = \lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0} \frac{v(t + \Delta t) - v(t)}{\Delta t}[/tex]

Now, look at the numerator (angle brackets mean dimension of ...):
[tex] \left[ v(t) \right] = \left[ v(t + \Delta t)\right] = \left[ v \right] \Rightarrow \left[ \Delta v \right] \equiv \left[ v(t + \Delta t) - v(t) \right] = \left[ v \right][/tex]
where we had used the rule from Dimensional analysis that one can only add and subtract physical quantities with the same dimension, and the result is of the same dimension.

Next, look at the fraction:
[tex] \left[ \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} \right] = \frac{\left[\Delta v \right]}{\left[ \Delta t \right]} = \frac{\left[ v \right]}{\left[ t \right]}[/tex]
where we had used the rule of Dimensional analysis that the dimension of a product or ratio of two physical quantities is the product or ratio of their dimensions.

Even if you take the limit as [itex]\Delta t \rightarrow 0[/itex], the dimensions of the ratio do not change. So:
[tex] \left[ \frac{d v}{d t} \right] = \left[ \frac{\Delta v}{\Delta t} \right] = \frac{\left[ v \right]}{\left[ t \right]}[/tex]

This is a general rule: The dimensions of a derivative of y w.r.t. x is simply [y]/[x].
 
sophiecentaur said:
But you claim that Dimensional Analysis doesn't work in calculus?
No, not at all. I simply warned the OP that v/t is not identical to dv/dt. For example, if m=1, v=1, t=1, F =/= 1 (except by pure chance) :rolleyes:
 
sophiecentaur said:
I think it was you who brought DA into it and you seemed to be 'dissin' it. All you were really doing was questioning the accuracy resulting from some assomptions? I'll buy that.
No, it wasn't me - and let's hope that the OP gets it. :smile:
 
Thank you all for your comments. I got it all