Product of Two Terms: Determinant Evaluation and Vanishing Values in Terms of p

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nylex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a determinant and finding the values of x for which it vanishes, expressed in terms of p. The initial calculations lead to the equation x(x - p)² = 0, indicating that the solutions are x = 0 and x = p. Participants confirm the correctness of this result, with one expressing relief at realizing the mistake in their earlier approach. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying determinant properties to solve the problem. Ultimately, the correct values of x are established as 0 and p.
Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
Hi, I' not sure if I've done this question correctly so I just want someone to tell me where I've gone wrong (if I have).

Evaluate the following determinant as a product of two terms. Hence find, in terms of p the values of x for which it vanishes.

Grr, I can't seem to use LaTeX properly so I'll just "draw" the determinant:

x x 0
0 x p
-2x -p x

= x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} x & p\\-p & x \end{array}\right\vert - x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} 0 & p\\-2x & x \end{array}\right\vert

= x(x^2 + p^2) - x(2xp)
=x^3 + p^2.x - 2x^2.p
- x(x^2 - 2px + p^2) = 0

x = {-(-2p) +- [(-2p)^2 - 4.1.p^2]^1/2}/2

x = [2p +- (4p^2 - 4p^2)^1/2]/2

x = p

It doesn't look right to me :/.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nylex said:
Hi, I' not sure if I've done this question correctly so I just want someone to tell me where I've gone wrong (if I have).

Evaluate the following determinant as a product of two terms. Hence find, in terms of p the values of x for which it vanishes.

Grr, I can't seem to use LaTeX properly so I'll just "draw" the determinant:

x x 0
0 x p
-2x -p x

= x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} x & p\\-p & x \end{array}\right\vert - x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} 0 & p\\-2x & x \end{array}\right\vert

= x(x^2 + p^2) - x(2xp)
=x^3 + p^2.x - 2x^2.p
- x(x^2 - 2px + p^2) = 0

x = {-(-2p) +- [(-2p)^2 - 4.1.p^2]^1/2}/2

x = [2p +- (4p^2 - 4p^2)^1/2]/2

x = p

It doesn't look right to me :/.
This is correct x(x-p)^2=0
==>x=0 or x=p
 
poolwin2001 said:
This is correct x(x-p)^2=0
==>x=0 or x=p

LOL, can't believe I didn't see that :redface:. Thanks a lot :smile:.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top