Naked eye view from intergalactic space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frankiewicz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Space
AI Thread Summary
In intergalactic space, halfway between the Milky Way and Andromeda, the naked eye would primarily see darkness with a few galaxies, including the Milky Way and Andromeda appearing as fuzzy blobs rather than distinct spiral shapes. The Andromeda galaxy would appear roughly four times larger than from Earth, but still lack clarity. Observers might discern a couple of nearby galaxies, like M81 and M82, under optimal conditions. The discussion references the Cosmological Principle, suggesting that the universe's properties remain consistent across vast distances. Overall, the view would be predominantly black with limited visibility of celestial objects.
Frankiewicz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If one were located in intergalactic space, say halfway between the Milky Way and Andromeda, what would space look like to the naked eye?

Would we see a relatively small number of galaxies and otherwise mostly just darkness? From that position would the Milky Way and Andromeda have any semblance of their spiral shapes to us (again to the naked eye), or would they appear like stars or perhaps nebulae at best?

Just trying to visualize -- thanks for any insights.

F
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Frankiewicz said:
If one were located in intergalactic space, say halfway between the Milky Way and Andromeda, what would space look like to the naked eye?

Would we see a relatively small number of galaxies and otherwise mostly just darkness? From that position would the Milky Way and Andromeda have any semblance of their spiral shapes to us (again to the naked eye), or would they appear like stars or perhaps nebulae at best?

Just trying to visualize -- thanks for any insights.

F

You know what the Andromeda galaxy looks like to the naked eye from here? In my experience it's a small fuzzy nebulous blob, which appears a bit more extended if the sky is very dark.

I'd guess that if you were half way there, it would basically be a fuzzy blob of twice the angular diameter, and looking back the Milky Way would be similar. I don't think much else would be visible at all; perhaps one or two satellite galaxies.
 
Frankiewicz, Welcome to Physics Forums!

I agree with Jonathan Scott's description of what you would see. This brings to mind “The Cosmological Principle” which we expect would apply everywhere in the universe.

“The cosmological principle is usually stated formally as 'Viewed on a sufficiently large scale, the properties of the Universe are the same for all observers.' This amounts to the strongly philosophical statement that the part of the Universe which we can see is a fair sample, and that the same physical laws apply throughout. In essence, this in a sense says that the Universe is knowable and is playing fair with scientists.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle
 
If you had good eyesight you'd probably be able to make out a couple other nearby galaxies, given the lack of ambient lighting. M81 and M82 are the first ones that come to mind, since with a good trained eye, one can make apparently make them out with a good knowledge of the sky and perfect viewing conditions.

So, it would be mostly black.

And @ Bobbywhy

Wouldn't it be a cruel joke by existence if our laws of physics were local and changed slightly throughout the universe and ~that~ was the reason we've not been contacted by extra terrestrials?
 
At half the distance, the apparent size of Andromeda would be 4x larger than from earth.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top