How Does Gauss' Law Apply to Electric Fields in a Hollow Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about applying Gauss' Law to a hollow sphere, participants clarify how to calculate the electric fields in different regions of the sphere based on its charge distribution. The total charge Q is uniformly distributed, and the charge density is derived from the volume between the inner radius R1 and outer radius R2. For a region inside the hollow sphere (r < R1), the electric field is zero due to no enclosed charge. In the region between the inner and outer radii (R1 < r < R2), the charge within radius r is calculated using the charge density times the volume. The overall charge Q remains in the equations, and participants discuss the proportionality of charge to volume when considering different radii.
underground
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey I am currently studying for my final and I am stuck on a question i have the solution but I am not sure what he did, could someone explain

A hollow sphere of the inner radius R1 and outer radius R2 is uniformly charges with total charge Q. Calculate the electruc fiels in the three regions shown in the cross-section view below 1) r<R1, 2) R1 < r <R2, and 3) r >R2

pPKRZ.png


What i don't get is part two, i know he is using gauess law Q inclosed/e = E(r)*A
but i don't know how he got Q and reduced it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi underground! welcome to pf! :smile:
underground said:
A hollow sphere of the inner radius R1 and outer radius R2 is uniformly charges with total charge Q.

What i don't get is part two, … i don't know how he got Q and reduced it

the total charge is Q, so the charge density is Q/volume = Q/{4π/3(R23 - R13)},

so the charge inside radius r is the density times the volume within radius r, ie 4π/3(r3 - R13) :wink:
 
Thanks for the respond I am getting there but can you explain one thing

I get what your saying but i don't see where the Q overall charge disappeard

P7rGZ.png


This is my logic of the question and the Q which is overall charge remained in the equation
 
suppose R1 was 0 (ie, a solid sphere) …

then the charge within radius r would be Q(r/R2)3, wouldn't it?

this is similar … the charge is Q times (volume/total-volume) :wink:
 
Thanks so much for your help :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top