Is There an Error in Converting I2 from Phasor to Time Domain?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of phasors to the time domain, specifically focusing on the current I2 with a frequency of ω=4. Participants express confusion regarding the lecturer's conversion of I2, questioning its accuracy due to the phase angle being outside the conventional range of +/- 180°. The correct representation of I2 should be 3.254 ∠160.6°, and the conversion should maintain the positive phase angle convention. This indicates a potential error in the lecturer's notes regarding the treatment of phase angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phasor representation in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of time domain conversion techniques
  • Familiarity with angular measurements and phase angle conventions
  • Basic principles of alternating current (AC) circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of converting phasors to time domain signals
  • Learn about phase angle conventions in AC analysis
  • Explore the implications of frequency on phasor conversions
  • Review examples of common errors in phasor to time domain conversions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, educators teaching AC circuit analysis, and professionals involved in signal processing or power systems who require a clear understanding of phasor conversions.

Evales
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
So we're converting these currents from phasor to time domain with ω=4.

I understand I1, but not how the lecturer got I2, is this an error with the notes?

We have these phasors:
xKnOJ.png


Which are converted to this time domain (respectively):
oF3SU.png


Any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. I2 doesn't look correct to me for a couple of reasons. First, if the angle had been adjusted by adding 360°, giving -160.6 + 360 = 199.4°, then the result should show it as a positive phase angle, not negative. Second, the convention is to specify phase angles in the range +/- 180°, and 199.4° falls outside this range.
 
Check I2. Possibly it was given as 3.254 ∠160.6°
and lecturer is converting all angles to lagging.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K