Free Falling Objects in GR: Initial Speed Matters

majong
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In GR a object follows a geodesic when free falling as I understand.
A object near the sun for instance wil fall to the sun following that line.

If the initial speed is different the path will be different.
How can it be that the geadesic is depending on the initial speed of the object.

Martin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A geodesic is a generalization of the notion of a 'straight line'; in Riemannian geometry as used in GR this is equivalent (locally) to the 'shortest line' between two given points(locally, b/c globally a geodesic need not be unique; an example is the S², i.e. the surface of the earth, where you have infinitly many geodesics connecting the north and the south pole).

Now for each point you have infinitly many directions, i.e. infinitly many geodesics.

In navigation you fix two points, e.g. "New York" and "London" and calculate the geodesic between these two cities. But in physics you use a different method, namely initial conditions specifying the initial point "New York" and the initial direction "eastward". Therefore you don't fix "London" but you let the initial conditions (position and idrection) plus the local e.o.m. (the geodesic equation) decide where the journey leads ...
 
majong said:
In GR a object follows a geodesic when free falling as I understand.
A object near the sun for instance wil fall to the sun following that line.

If the initial speed is different the path will be different.
How can it be that the geadesic is depending on the initial speed of the object.

Martin

In this context, the geodesics are in 4D space-time, and include the time dimension. Changing the initial speed is equivalent to changing the trajectory of the 4 velocity, which switches you to a different geodesic.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top