Lorentz covariance and Noether's theorem

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
Not sure its in the right place or not.If its not,sorry.

The relativity postulate of special relativity says that all physical equations should remain invariant under lorentz transformations And that includes Lagrangian too.
So it seems we have a symmetry(which is continuous),So by Noether's theorem,there should be a conserved quantity associated with it but I can't find what is that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conserved quantity is the angular momentum. Relativistically it's an antisymmetric tensor Jμν. See this recent thread.
 
Bill_K said:
The conserved quantity is the angular momentum. Relativistically it's an antisymmetric tensor Jμν. See this recent thread.

Here http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/boosts.html is a discussion of the topic that focuses more directly on the boosts, as opposed to the rotations. Charles Torre's post near the bottom talks about how the distinction between boosts and rotations is not Lorentz-invariant. But putting aside this issue, I think it's fair to say that the boosts relate more directly to the center of mass, not to angular momentum, although the center of mass is part of what's described by the angular momentum tensor.

Another discussion: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/12559/what-conservation-law-corresponds-to-lorentz-boosts
 
You should better look at Poincare invariance which results in conserved quantities for spatial rotations (angular momentum), boosts (boosts ?) and energy / momentum (time / space translation).
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top