Optically active materials + Faraday Rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between the Faraday effect and normal optical activity regarding the rotation of linearly polarized light. It is established that the Faraday effect's direction of rotation is dependent solely on the magnetic field direction and is independent of wave propagation direction. In contrast, optical activity does not exhibit this independence; the rotation direction can vary based on the propagation direction. Specifically, while a Faraday rotator alters polarization upon reflection, an optically active material maintains its original polarization state. Overall, the behaviors of these two phenomena are fundamentally different in terms of how they affect light propagation.
freemind
Hello folks,

I have been told that for a linearly polarised wave, the direction of rotation due to the Faraday effect (caused by a constant magnetic field) is independent of the direction of wave propagation, dependent only upon the direction of the magnetic field. Fair enough. Does this property hold for normal optical activity? Is the direction of rotation the same in an optically active material regardless of direction of propagation?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freemind said:
Hello folks,

I have been told that for a linearly polarised wave, the direction of rotation due to the Faraday effect (caused by a constant magnetic field) is independent of the direction of wave propagation, dependent only upon the direction of the magnetic field. Fair enough. Does this property hold for normal optical activity? Is the direction of rotation the same in an optically active material regardless of direction of propagation?

Thanks.

I think that the answer to your question is no (although someone may correct me). The magnetic field (in the Faraday effect) breaks the symmetry of the situation. Suppose you send linearly polarized light (say s-polarized) through a Faraday rotator that rotates the light 45 degrees. If you place a mirror after the rotator that sends it back the way it came, the light will be p-polarized after it goes through the rotator a second time. However, if you replace the rotator with a normal optically active material, the output polarization will be what it was originally (s-polarized). That is why a Faraday rotator (coupled with a polarizer) works as an http://www.eoc-inc.com/leysop/Faraday_optical_isolator_rotators.htm (light can only go one direction). Hope this helps.
 
freemind said:
Is the direction of rotation the same in an optically active material regardless of direction of propagation?

Thanks.

If by "direction of propagation", you mean one way or the other along the optic axis, then no, the Farady effect and optically active materials behave differently, as was said above. An optically active material could be said to be either clockwise or anticlockwise, while for the Faraday effect, "clockwise-ness" depends on direction.

If you include directions that are not along the optic axis, the question is a bit more complicated.
 
I see how the direction of rotation is dependent upon the direction of propagation. Thanks a lot for the replies.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top