Derivation of Faraday's Law from the Lorentz Force Law

AI Thread Summary
Faraday's Law of Induction and Ampere's Force Law are interconnected through the Lorentz Force Law, which describes the force on a charged particle in a magnetic field. The derivation presented shows how the induced electromotive force (emf) relates to magnetic flux density and the velocity of charge. It emphasizes that the emf arises from both motion and changes in magnetic flux, highlighting their distinct contributions. The discussion also references a Wikipedia page for further details on the derivation. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of electromagnetic theory.
Lamarr
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
Someone asked me how Faraday's Law of Induction and Ampere's Force Law, both which form part of Maxwell's Equations, are related.

Ampere's Force Law is derived from the Lorentz Force Law. They are entirely compatible with Faraday's Law of Induction. Here's how...The Lorentz Force Law states:

F_B=Bq \times v

B Magnetic flux Density

q Magnitude of charge

v Velocity of charge

q=ALρ_q \frac{dq}{dt}=Ap_q. \frac{dL}{dt}

ρ_q Charge density

A Cross-sectional area

L Length
v=\frac{dL}{dt}
∴F_B=\frac{dL}{dt} \times B.ALρ_q=Ap_q. \frac{dL}{dt}×BL
F_B=\frac{dq}{dt}×BLV=\frac{dW}{dq}

V Potential Difference

W Work done

x Perpendicular displacementW=∫F_B .dx=∫\frac{dq}{dt}×BL .dx

W=∫BL\frac{dx}{dt} .dq

∴V=BL\frac{dx}{dt}
BLx=\phi

\phi Magnetic Flux DensityAssuming B and L to be invariant:

BL\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{d\phi}{dt}

∴V=\frac{d\phi}{dt}
A very crappy derivation, but it's the best possible way to show the direct connection between the two formulas.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hope I haven't made any mistakes. :blushing:
 
This page on wikipedia also has a derivation of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday's_law_of_induction

And it has references 22,23,24 that might give details on the derivation. I am interested in this myself, so I'll probably check them out too :)
 
Are you familiar with the fact that the emf induced comes from two parts one is the motion part which you are counting and the other is flux change(both are different).think about faraday disk and see how will you apply flux rule to count for emf.
 
Well flux change is due to motion as well.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
346
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top